CarWale
    AD

    Mercedes-Benz AMG GT 63 S E Performance vs Mercedes-Benz AMG E53 Cabriolet vs Mercedes-Benz AMG GT 63 S 4MATIC Plus

    CarWale brings you comparison of Mercedes-Benz AMG GT 63 S E Performance, Mercedes-Benz AMG E53 Cabriolet and Mercedes-Benz AMG GT 63 S 4MATIC Plus. The Mercedes-Benz AMG GT 63 S E Performance price is Rs. 3.30 Crore, Mercedes-Benz AMG E53 Cabriolet price is Rs. 1.30 Crore and Mercedes-Benz AMG GT 63 S 4MATIC Plus price is Rs. 2.70 Crore. The Mercedes-Benz AMG GT 63 S E Performance is available in 3982 cc engine with 2 fuel type options: Petrol and Plug-in Hybrid (Electric + Petrol), Mercedes-Benz AMG E53 Cabriolet is available in 2999 cc engine with 1 fuel type options: Petrol and Mercedes-Benz AMG GT 63 S 4MATIC Plus is available in 3982 cc engine with 1 fuel type options: Petrol. AMG GT 63 S 4MATIC Plus provides the mileage of 8.8 kmpl.

    AMG GT 63 S E Performance vs AMG E53 Cabriolet vs AMG GT 63 S 4MATIC Plus Comparison Overview

    Key HighlightsAMG GT 63 S E Performance AMG E53 Cabriolet AMG GT 63 S 4MATIC Plus
    PriceRs. 3.30 CroreRs. 1.30 CroreRs. 2.70 Crore
    Engine Capacity3982 cc2999 cc3982 cc
    Power843 bhp429 bhp630 bhp
    TransmissionAutomatic (TC)Automatic (TC)Automatic (TC)
    Fuel TypePlug-in Hybrid (Electric + Petrol)PetrolPetrol
    Mercedes-Benz AMG GT 63 S E Performance
    Rs. 3.30 Crore
    Avg. Ex-Showroom price
    VS
    Mercedes-Benz AMG E53 Cabriolet
    Rs. 1.30 Crore
    Avg. Ex-Showroom price
    VS
    Mercedes-Benz AMG GT 63 S 4MATIC Plus
    Rs. 2.70 Crore
    Avg. Ex-Showroom price
    VS
    Select Car
    Select Car
    VS
    VS
    VS
    Select Car
    Select Car
    • SPECIFICATIONS
    • FEATURES
    • BROCHURE
    • COLOURS
    • USER REVIEWS
        • SPECIFICATIONS
        • FEATURES
        • BROCHURE
        • COLOURS
        • USER REVIEWS

            Specifications and Finance

            Finance
            Loading...
            Loading...
            Loading...
            Loading...
            Loading...
            Loading...
            • Engine & Transmission
            • Dimensions & Weight
            • Capacity
            • Suspensions, Brakes, Steering & Tyres

            Features

            • Safety
            • Braking & Traction
            • Locks & Security
            • Comfort & Convenience
            • Telematics
            • Seats & Upholstery
            • Storage
            • Doors, Windows, Mirrors & Wipers
            • Exterior
            • Lighting
            • Instrumentation
            • Entertainment, Information & Communication
            • Manufacturer Warranty

            Brochure

            Colours

            Graphite Grey Metallic
            Obsidian Black Metallic
            Brilliant Blue
            Spectral Blue
            Spectral Blue Magno
            Obsidian Black
            Obsidian Black
            Selenite Grey
            Designo Brilliant Blue Magno
            Polar White
            Patagonia Red Bright
            Designo Graphite Grey Magno
            Hi-Tech Silver
            Opalite White Bright
            Graphite Grey
            Designo Selenite Grey Magno
            Iridium Silver
            Jupiter Red
            Polar White
            Designo Diamond White Bright

            User Reviews

            Overall Rating

            2.5/5

            2 Ratings

            4.8/5

            4 Ratings

            4.0/5

            1 Rating

            Rating Parameters

            3.0Exterior

            5.0Exterior

            3.0Comfort

            4.8Comfort

            3.0Performance

            5.0Performance

            2.5Fuel Economy

            4.0Fuel Economy

            2.5Value for Money

            4.3Value for Money

            Most Helpful Review

            Less impressive

            Less impressive is the rear-wheel steering, which below 62mph turns in the opposite direction to the front axle and above that speed in the same direction. On a number of occasions during our test, when turning into a corner there's what feels like a delay in the rear axle's reaction. Don't buy this car over the competitor's cars like the BMW M8 which is far more better than this piece of junk. I am fed that this car gives me a lot of problems, the engine light comes on for no reason and went to the service centre but I got no response and I don't know why this car sounds like a tracker. The BMW M8 is 10 times better, I suggest not to buy this car at all over a mighty Bmw, Audi, or Jaguar.

            Overall good car

            I got to use a used car from a car reseller in Delhi. It is a very fast and smooth to drive with no hiccups. Pick-up is fantastic and is quick even on comfort mode. The cockpit is unlike any car I have ever seen. The car has tons of options for customization, Rear seat has poor legroom and overall comfort, while the front seats are comfy. The only con I faced was that the car is hard on tires if you like to drive fast sometimes.

            You may also like
            Starting at Rs. 1,60,00,000

            AMG GT 63 S E Performance comparison with similar cars

            AMG E53 Cabriolet comparison with similar cars

            AMG GT 63 S 4MATIC Plus comparison with similar cars

            AMG GT 63 S E Performance vs AMG E53 Cabriolet vs AMG GT 63 S 4MATIC Plus Comparison FAQs

            Q: Which car is cheaper between Mercedes-Benz AMG GT 63 S E Performance, Mercedes-Benz AMG E53 Cabriolet and Mercedes-Benz AMG GT 63 S 4MATIC Plus?
            Mercedes-Benz AMG GT 63 S E Performance price is Rs. 3.30 Crore, Mercedes-Benz AMG E53 Cabriolet price is Rs. 1.30 Crore and Mercedes-Benz AMG GT 63 S 4MATIC Plus price is Rs. 2.70 Crore. Hence Mercedes-Benz AMG E53 Cabriolet is the cheapest amongst these cars.

            Q: How is the performance of AMG GT 63 S E Performance compared to AMG E53 Cabriolet and AMG GT 63 S 4MATIC Plus?
            For the Limousine variant, 3982 cc Plug-in Hybrid (Electric + Petrol) engine of AMG GT 63 S E Performance produces 843 bhp of power and 1470 Nm of torque. For the 4MATIC Plus variant, 2999 cc Petrol engine of AMG E53 Cabriolet produces 429 bhp of power and 520 Nm of torque. For the Limousine variant, 3982 cc Petrol engine of AMG GT 63 S 4MATIC Plus produces 630 bhp @ 6250 rpm of power and 900 Nm @ 2500 rpm of torque.
            Disclaimer: For the above Comparison of Compare AMG GT 63 S E Performance, AMG E53 Cabriolet and AMG GT 63 S 4MATIC Plus, CarWale has taken utmost care in gathering precise and accurate information about price, specs, features, colours etc, however, CarWale cannot be held liable for any direct or indirect damage/loss. For Compare AMG GT 63 S E Performance, AMG E53 Cabriolet and AMG GT 63 S 4MATIC Plus comparison, we have considered most popular variant on CarWale as default, however, any variant of these cars can be compared.
            • Home
            • Compare Cars
            • Mercedes-Benz AMG GT 63 S E Performance vs Mercedes-Benz AMG E53 Cabriolet vs Mercedes-Benz AMG GT 63 S 4MATIC Plus