C3 Price in Pithoragarh

Overall a good car but a little costly for the features provided. Looks and performance is good but my driving experience was not so good and the suspension is not too much good also also the handling.

My Buying Experience is Very Good, Driving This Car i can say that this car can beat all the cars which came in the Range of upto @20Lakhs. It can do 0 to 100 under 10 sec. i have not seen any cons in it till date

Amazing car in terms of space, performance, SUSPENSION and looks it is a compact SUV and not a hatchback people needs to go and see this car for themselves and realize what they are missing on, as far as features are considered they are ample and one would not miss on any modern day features at this price point.

The driving experience is very good.The overall interior,inside quality with suitable space and sound quality is excellent.The Safety features is available.Service of car on door is available.

Everything seems to be awesome with the budget in car, one of the best to compete in the market. Excellent performance with great feel while driving the car...Best in the segment..!

Pros- a) Looks b) Music System & AC c) Suspension Cons- a) After-sales service is extremely bad. No service on wheels. b) Insurance claim process. c) Safety- Heard it has got 0 stars in Brazil and same might be for the Indian model. d) Average- Horrible within the city. e) No option to upgrade IVRM, OVRM etc. f) Very hard clutch. You might get knee pain & back pain.

I have recently derived this car for approx 150 km between delhi to rishikesh. My driving experience was amazing. Car gives average of approx 19-20 km per liter. Control was also good. And now I am also looking to buy this car, because this car is in budget for me.

Best comfort Excellent interior Best on road performance Best SUV in low budget Cons Low quality material in interior Number of service center are very less Expensive service cost

1. Driving Experience: The turbo engine is powerful which makes for a peppy ride. However, compared to the XUV 3XO, I found that I had to floor the pedals harder. The power and torque on the naturally aspirated engine could be much better. The suspension can handle small bumps but there was some amount of body rolling at high speeds. The driver’s seat could be more comfortable which is where I felt a considerable difference from the 3XO. At high speeds, the car felt a little out of control as the steering does not feel as heavy as it should. 2. Looks: I do not find the C3 visually appealing. The front could have a wider grill which would give the illusion of a more expensive car. The car logo which blends with the grill does not look good to me. The front could be revised to match the front design with the oval logo on the global c3 air cross variant. Meanwhile, the back could do with a more sporty hatchback look like rivals Kiger and Fronx. One of the core reasons I did not proceed to purchase the car was the bland road presence and lack of safety features. The interiors on the contrary are nicely done, with an arm console, large infotainment unit and a sporty AC vent design. 3. Features: For its price, the car has all the features one needs for day-to-day city driving. Future revisions should focus on adding more safety features which is where the car lacks completely with a 0 on the Latin Am NCAP. Ventilated seats and wireless charging could be a plus, differentiating it from other rivals.