4.0 Exterior | 1.0 Comfort | 2.0 Performance |
2.0 Fuel Economy | 3.0 Value for Money |
Exterior Very Good Desing, Well build compare to Maruthi, Hyundia Cars. Good quality Materials/Metals used forwhole car. Welding is very good. very neat work. Alloy wheel design is good.
Interior (Features, Space & Comfort) Good. No space for rear seat passenger. Only two people can sit back side. For 5 people it is very congested. No AC vent for rear people. Seat orientation is also not very comfortable for passengers to getinside or get outside. Seat quality is good.
Engine Performance, Fuel Economy and Gearbox Pick up for petrol engine is not good. If you switch on AC, it slowdown further. Gear box transition is good. Reverse gear transition is different from other cars, which may confuse initially, later one will be adjusted to it. Fuel economy is poor. 12kmpl.
Ride Quality & Handling Steering is electronic, which makes driver bit easy to turn, however one feel unsafe compare to hydraulic steering. One feel very light weight. Handling is good but not as Punto or Figo. Shock observers are also ok type, average. Because of lesser ground clearance one should be careful in normal roads. High way performance is good.
Final Words Good car for high way, not good for normal roads where humps are more. If 4 people with luggage, it reduces further, we can see shock observer also become little rigid. High beam also not so good, so night driving will be difficult when some other guy come with high beam. It can be adjusted later.
Areas of improvement Ground clearance, Pick up, Wheel base. Backside seat space. AC.
Build Quality, Look, Meterials used, Exterior DesignGroud Clearance, Pickpup, Back Seat Space, Steering