మహీంద్రా క్వాంటో [2012-2016] వినియోగదారుల రివ్యూలు

I purchased Mahindra Quanto in 2013 and I'm happy with my decision. The buying experience was hassle-free. The driving experience is comfortable and smooth, with responsive handling and good visibility. The car's high ground clearance and compact size make it easy to navigate in city traffic and on rough terrain. The spacious interior with comfortable seats and ample legroom is a definite plus. The Quanto's fuel efficiency is also impressive, with an average mileage of around 14 km/l. Maintenance and service at Mahindra dealerships are straightforward, and the standard warranty of 2 years or 50,000 km, whichever comes first, gives me peace of mind. Pros of the Quanto include its practical design, spacious interior, and fuel efficiency. However, the boxy exterior design and lack of advanced safety features could be considered as cons. Overall, the Mahindra Quanto is a great value-for-money SUV that suits my needs perfectly. If you're looking for an economical and versatile vehicle that still offers comfort and functionality, then the Quanto could be a great choice.

Exterior Front looks quite aggressive and sporty, with the image it carries. Mahindra's logo is placed perfect..however the rear looks a bit flat and wagon like. Needs some improvement..

Interior (Features, Space & Comfort) Doesnt look nice, same old plastics of the Xyo?

Engine Performance, Fuel Economy and Gearbox This is something I appreciate..adequate engine power for such a car.

Ride Quality & Handling Dont know yet..But however should be good considering Xylo's record..

Final Words Looks like an apt combo for Indian customer who is looking for space, fuel economy and Power. Though lookwise dont think this is a head-turner, but definitely utility-wise Quanto shd score high wrt to its current competitors. 

Areas of improvement Interior and Rear looks. Also pls provide Sunroof option and 4X4. Interior plastics have been so hopeless for most of the Mahindra vehicles. I myself drives a Scorpio M-Hawk. Electrics also fail very often and needs improvement. Roll-up windows motors hopefully have been changed; this has been one of the worst experience I had in my Scorpio.

Power to WeightInteriors

Exterior is gud stepny at the back looks very gud nd over all design looks gud its a complete compack suv nd even gud for city driving and easy to park at conjusted places.

Interior (Features, Space & Comfort) Interior space is too gud nd armrest at front seat is very comfortable nd driver information system helps alot overall a gud car high ground clearance is gud for the indian roads nd so many things which helps in daily use like charging points at all 3 rows big big rear view mirrors.

Engine Performance, Fuel Economy and Gearbox All r gud bt Mahindra should work on fuel efficiency.

Ride Quality & Handling is good.

Final Words a gud car to have in this price tag i have booked one c6 black .in 7 lacks u can get only base models of any sedan or can get a hatch bt this car realy worth it.

Areas of improvement Fuel efficiency wooden touch on dash nd electricaly folding outer view mirrors, stearing controls,folding middle seats.

Space,drive seat height adjustable,abs,ebd,arm rest nd much moreFuel efficient is bit low conjusted 3rd row

Exterior Exterior has the same look of xylo. Well curved body contour gives a fine touch to good look. Wheels look bit small for 1.5L engine.

Interior (Features, Space & Comfort) Interior is loaded with features. Good looking dash board. Front seats are comfortable. Long leg room for driver. Middle row seats are pretty flat and lacks support for thighs, which can cause discomfort in long drives. Third row is literally meant for children, that too small children. In third row, adults cannot sit with head straight, if adults sit in third row, head will literally touch the back door. 

Engine Performance, Fuel Economy and Gearbox Engine performance looks good, but not yet driven.

Ride Quality & Handling Low ground clearnace compared to Duster can cause off road driving problems.

Final Words Third row seats are stuffed in. Middle row can accommodate three fat people comfortably. Back door needs to be made straight to avoid third row passangers constantly banging their head to the door. Overall value for money. Front row passangers will enjoy long drives, while middle and third row passangers will curse long drives.

Areas of improvement Third row seats must be made spacy, back door needs to be made flat to get some extra space. Need to have high rails to give a tall boy look.

Good exterior looks. Sufficient headroom.Back seats are meant for small children not for adults. Third row seats lack under thigh cushions.

Exterior

 Overall looks good if you really like a fat chubby kid running around. hope this kid dont get hurt.

Interior (Features, Space & Comfort)

 Baby seats should be positioned in driving direction. Side sitting will be comfortable?

Engine Performance, Fuel Economy and Gearbox

 Generally good. Why my gear box is not dashboard mounted. it will add beauty na. Turbo boost is right from start like xylo or should reach certain rpm like other diesel cars

Ride Quality & Handling

 A Tall boy can be controlled easily.

Final Words

 A good alternative for sumo, grande sumo. Now a tough competition for Tata. However I dont think it will be a competitor for ertiga or duster. my weekends will be completely occupied if i get this kid in my family. Wish you all happy motoring with mahindra quonto.

Areas of improvement  

 Parking assist should be in upper middle variant. Any secret box in quonto

 

Big thrill packed in a small boySeating arrangements

Exterior

Exterior seems to be very Good. Liked it very much as compare it with the Ertiga. Style is new or we can say that it is mini Xylo with added falvours.

Interior (Features, Space & Comfort)

 Interior is very good with nice features. Seems having all the features that a competetior car having in it's top model. Space seems to be less as compare with Ertiga. Also, overall length is less in MUV class.

Engine Performance, Fuel Economy and Gearbox

 Fuel economy is OK.

Ride Quality & Handling

 N/A

Final Words

 As concluded from the comparison, this is the value for money car and may be the cheapest in it's segment with such features and style. Space seems to be less as per overall length and 07 seats. Interior is good with nice features.

Areas of improvement  

 Ground Clearance to be improved. Seems to be clearance is very less as compare with overall hieght of the car.

 

Good Style as compare with ErtigaOverall Length is less as compare with Ertiga.

Exterior Good looks and apearance.

Interior (Features, Space & Comfort) Feature loaded , lot of space and confort. No one is tired after 500 KM . Plains or Hills kaccha or Pakka road or no road - it takes me smooth.. Loaded with features and so easy and confortable drive . Love it after 72000 KM.

Engine Performance, Fuel Economy and Gearbox Enigne is powerful and stong on highways and Hills as well,but dies at low rpm unless shiftt to 1st gear on mud  roads going uphill and its rainy.

Ride Quality & Handling Ride quality s great after yo get used to a litte rool.

Final Words Fantastic First SUV. Value for Money. Just experience it if you want an SUV at 8-9 lac range. Singleof Famil drive - it is all comfort.

Areas of improvement Please  wheels 18". Offer in Automatic version  and also 4 x 4 version, Add features like sun roof and climate controll and cruze control as options.I mean allow Quanto fans to upgrade whe they wish to invest and enjoy.

Power , Comfort and Milagesmall wheels

Exterior is very good looking , smart compact urban SUV body, feels like riding SUV, plastic used inside the interior is not upto the mark, vibrates of shaky and bumpy roads, road clearance is good enough, performance of engine is good, Economical if terms of fuel consumption, Excellant running of highways, Ride smooth on highways but little difficult on bumpy roads, last rear seats as not suitable for adults, only childred in emergency can be sitted, AC require some improvement and rear seat is not feeling comfortable with the performance.

Long ride abount 600-700 kms in Haryana Rajasthan without any break and feel comfortable with the car, only bumpy roads may cause inconvinenace due to high seating. Suspension may be improved so that minimum jerks to the passeger on rear seats.  Mahindra has overlook the  comfort of passenger, middle  seat should be more comfortable and it should be make foldable so that boot space increase if  require.

Improvement required:  suspension and interior.

Overall Performance: Very Good, Value to money.

Budget Urban SUV, Open new segement in Indian marketPoor plastic used in interiors

Exterior Good but need to have a different look than Xylo. Especially front side. It looks like a MUV & not a SUV.

Interior (Features, Space & Comfort) Int are same as Xylo. Should be more premium. Front seats armrest quality is poor. Otherwise OK. Some of the features like snacks tray, bottle holders, two row of lamps are good.

Engine Performance, Fuel Economy and Gearbox Overall good. Does not feel exhausted.

Ride Quality & Handling Good. Good height, which gives good road visibility. Some amount of body roll.

Final Words Good buy except the a/c. The a/c is practically absent. It does not cool at all. The air does not even reach 2nd row. Third row feels suffocated. M&M must work on these aspects. Otherwise a very practical car in the given price. Mahindra could think on increasing the third row space by taking the spare wheel off the rear door and still maintain the length below 4m. 

Areas of improvement A/c must be improved. Also work on exterior front looks & third row seats / space.

SpaceVery poor a/c