3.0 Exterior | 2.0 Comfort | 3.0 Performance |
3.0 Fuel Economy | 2.0 Value for Money |
Last weak i had an oppurtinity to see nano closely and my experience was just like driving in an auto rickshaw.
The price tag of rs 1,00,000/- is not at all correct as most ot the models are above 1,50,000/- on road with all basic acceseries .the size of the tyre makes me uncomfortable camparing the size of pot holes, this car looks great but the drivers view is obstructive campared to size of the car, won`t be surprised to see this car taking place of auto rickshaw within this 5 years.obvious cant campare the quality of this car since there is no other option in this price tag,this car is for people who drives less than 5000 km yearly.the front seats are mounted on 2pipes with nut bolt fitting which will give lots of problem later. the luggage space is behind back seat and seat has to be folded.this car if it had launched 15years back would have been great success but in todays driving condition it would make traffic condition worst ,goverment instead of promoting low cost cars by giving subsidy sez facality should provide proper infrastructure in form of public transport rails ferrys which is degraded day by day I am not against poor people car but the fact is that the maintaince cost are much more campared to its price and type of material used , the only positive is that fuel prices are stable and once price goes above 100rs/lt itwould be very easy to buy a car than to drive it .
HATS UP TO TATAS & TENSION TO BAJAJ
DREAM CAR FOR PEOPLE WHO DREAMSSMALL TYRES FOR PATHETIC INDIAN ROADS