4.0 வெளிப்புறம் | 4.0 ஆறுதல் | 3.0 செயல்திறன் |
4.0 ஃப்யூல் எகானமி | 4.0 பணத்திற்கான மதிப்பு |
Exterior Very good. looks like swift.
Interior (Features, Space & Comfort) Less space for back seat members.
Engine Performance, Fuel Economy and sound like diesel car. but not bad.
Ride Quality & Handling Not bad. exterior looking better than alto 800, interior is very less space, bad thing is not availabe more servicing centers. any way atlast value for money. Spare parts counter sales not available indealers.Even for Duster spare parts is not available. I am concerned because Duster is SUV bought by elite people who can service there vehicle at service centers regularly and can change the kit instead of a spare also the other interesting news is Maruthi Suzuki S cross tops in sale than Duster because Maruthi's spares are available everywhere. Duster have much better look good vehicle but as soon as S cross launched it tops the table. However saying about Kwid ts an entry level car bought by common poor people who dreams long time for a car and risks their savings who want the cheapest maintenance after warranty period (4years). I am not saying we need it in an open market just in your authorized dealers may be only for Kwid may be by ordering, there should be an option for buying the smallest, each and every spares.
Final Words Not bad.
Areas of improvement NA.
Good exterior looking. value for money.back seat only for two members, low space for back seat members