டொயோட்டா இனோவா ஹைகிராஸ் vs மிட்சுபிஷி அவுட்லேண்டர்

11 Ratings

32 Ratings

Poor distribution of Features across variants

Features are not well distributed across the variants... Between GX and VX there is 5 lakhs rupees difference.. Since G- SLF is only for fleet operators then one more variant in non hybrid could have been better with 1. SIX airbags, 2. Sunroof, 3. Touch screen and better music system 4. 360 camera.. 5. NO DRL To get a 6 airbags, Sunroof and other comfort features one has to go until ZX variant which is the downside. One more non-hybrid variant in that 5 lakhs gap could have given real competition to XUV, HECTOR, SAFARI etc.. So definitely it looks like XUV700 is still a better VFM and car for every budget...

Poor service back up though a great car

I owned Outlander for 7 years. Undoubtedly an amazing machine. Superior to CRV, Endeavor and the likes in performance. Designed for high speed on highways and can manoeuvre in the city as well. But... Worst ever service back up. No parts like even ORVM, forget major parts. I was reduced to a beggar in Bangalore SVR Motors. I tried contacting Mitsubishi cost care, and Hind Motors directly for parts but no use. All that just to replace a broken ORVM. Mitsubishi, with its half-hearted 2nd attempt, won't survive for long in this competitive Indian car market. Again buyers will be trapped. A beautiful car with total lack of after-sales cares him just a good as a great surgeon with poor post-op care. You know the end!