ஹோண்டா சிட்டி vs மாருதி சுஸுகி சியாஸ் [2014-2017]

20 Ratings

3 Ratings

Reliable predictable and consistent performance

I drove this car to Badrinath , Really enjoy the driving it's movability and engine is really very smooth Very good car If you drive between 60 to 70 km/h We get average 20++ AC is very effective

First Car

<p><strong>Exterior&nbsp;</strong>Similar to honda city and hyundai verna, but no doubt maruti came up which was never expected. The longest in C Segment Sedan. Quite happy with exterior looks. &nbsp;</p> <p>Well if one can add some spoiler and side skirts, then it will look the best modified car ever.&nbsp;</p> <p><strong>Interior (Features, Space &amp; Comfort)</strong>&nbsp;Very much satisified with the amount of features I recevied in the base model. I really got whatever I wanted it. I am not satisfied with the key received since I was expecting a Smart KEy in all models.</p> <p><strong>Engine Performance, Fuel Economy and Gearbox</strong>&nbsp;Well, I havent driven much. Just made a run of about 250 Km uptill now with a tank recharge of 2000 Rs. So the overall economy received uptill now is around 15Km/litre. Can expect to increase after the service.</p> <p><strong>Ride Quality &amp; Handling</strong>&nbsp;Car absorbs all the potholes and bump so smoothly. Much better than Hyundai Verna and Honda City. Second thing its a low maintenance as compared to others.</p> <p><strong>Final Words</strong>&nbsp;It was worth waiting for it.I really enjoy my new car. If you a pure C Segment Sedan Experience just go ahead with Ciaz.</p>Space,Styling,Comfort,Ride,EconomySuspension tend to make noise on deep potholes