Skoda Rapid [2011-2014] User Reviews

All Skoda Rapid [2011-2014] Elegance 1.6 MPI AT Reviews

(3)

All
5
4
3
2
1

Sort by :

All
5
4
3
2
1

Sort by :

Not upto the mark
13 years ago | John
After 3 months of thorough research I finally took my decision. My choices were Hyundai Verna, Honda City and Skoda Rapid (all Automatic Transmission). Finally I bought Verna since I liked the features and I am mainly looking out for City drive.

However I thought I would put my comments since I spent so much time researching and test-driving Skoda Rapid.

Exterior Good looks, like any Skoda.

Interior (Features, Space & Comfort) 4 seater car. 5 guys cant sit comfortably due to the height of middle bar at rear seat. Power steering is excellent, effortless, felt much better than Corrolla Altis.
No USB controls for Audio system. Odd audio system looks. Not upto 2011-12 year models in honda, hyundai and other cars.

Engine Performance, Fuel Economy and Gearbox Not sure about fuel economy. Performance is superb. Good suspension on back seat. I tried the AT version so, cannot comment on Gearbox.

Ride Quality & Handling Ride quality and handling is superb.

Final Words I liked Hyundai interiors, I wont care much about the interior quality.

Areas of improvement Things I mentioned in the Cons can be improved.
Excellent power steering, good suspension4 seater car, dull interior colors, no steering controls, no usb on audio system,
Rating parameters(out of 5)
4
Exterior/Styles
2
Comfort & Space
5
Performance (Engine/Gear/Overall)
3
Fuel Economy
2
Value for Money/Features
About the Reviewer
Purchase Not Purchased
Driven forDid a short drive once
Read More
Was this review helpful?
25
2
Rapivento-Skoda's Vento
13 years ago | Oggy_O
Exterior

It is an edited Vento,but rear gets the Skoda C-Motif on Laura.Its booted version of Fabia

Interior (Features, Space & Comfort)

This car is sparesely equipped.Steering controls,USB port,parking sensors and park navigation system plus leather-wrapped steering.The Vento gets these but Rapid gets none of these.It gets only essentials,SD card port,Aux-in port,Climate control,power windows,airbags and ABS.Now,it is comfortable and also spacious,but it does not have the hatch of Superb and Laura.It only gets a regular boot.

Engine Performance, Fuel Economy and Gearbox

The Skoda Rapid has the same 1.6,105 bhp engine and fuel economy in VW Vento,so no diffrentiating.It is only the Fabia's gearbox that makes it different.

Ride Quality & Handling

Ride quality is nice and handling too is good.

Final Words

Rapid is better than SX4 and Aveo but no match of Verna.It gets less features but is cheaper.so it is better than vERNA

Areas of improvement

Equipment,Aftersales,Boot hatch
Looks,Skoda Badge,Space,Comfort,Good VFMLess equipment,aftersales network,lacks boot hatch
Rating parameters(out of 5)
5
Exterior/Styles
5
Comfort & Space
4
Performance (Engine/Gear/Overall)
5
Fuel Economy
4
Value for Money/Features
About the Reviewer
Purchase New
Driven forFew hundred kilometers
Mileage12 kmpl
Read More
Was this review helpful?
4
1
Gill skoda onwer
4 years ago | Jagjit singh
Am used this car rapid is too good my lovely brand this is very very good my dream next car is Skoda suv top model because this is soild than another brand is very very weak than Skoda.
Rating parameters(out of 5)
3
Exterior/Styles
4
Comfort & Space
5
Performance (Engine/Gear/Overall)
5
Fuel Economy
4
Value for Money/Features
About the Reviewer
Purchase Used
Driven forIts my mate since ages
Read More
Was this review helpful?
0
0

Back
1
Next