CarWale
    AD

    Skoda Rapid [2011-2014] User Reviews

    Looking for Skoda Rapid [2011-2014]? Here are the reviews and ratings by Rapid [2011-2014] owners from across the country.

    Rapid [2011-2014] Image

    3.3/5

    124 Ratings

    5 star

    13%

    4 star

    37%

    3 star

    25%

    2 star

    17%

    1 star

    9%

    Variant
    Elegance 1.6 MPI AT
    Rs. 9,68,361
    Last recorded price

    Categories (out of 5)

    • 3.9Exterior
    • 3.8Comfort
    • 3.6Performance
    • 3.5Fuel Economy
    • 3.3Value for Money

    All Skoda Rapid [2011-2014] Elegance 1.6 MPI AT Reviews

     (3)
    • All
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    Sort by :
    • All
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    Sort by :
    • Not upto the mark
      13 years ago | John

      After 3 months of thorough research I finally took my decision. My choices were Hyundai Verna, Honda City and Skoda Rapid (all Automatic Transmission). Finally I bought Verna since I liked the features and I am mainly looking out for City drive. 

      However I thought I would put my comments since I spent so much time researching and test-driving Skoda Rapid.

      Exterior Good looks, like any Skoda.

      Interior (Features, Space & Comfort) 4 seater car. 5 guys cant sit comfortably due to the height of middle bar at rear seat. Power steering is excellent, effortless, felt much better than Corrolla Altis. 
      No USB controls for Audio system. Odd audio system looks. Not upto 2011-12 year models in honda, hyundai and other cars.

      Engine Performance, Fuel Economy and Gearbox Not sure about fuel economy. Performance  is superb. Good suspension on back seat. I tried the AT version so, cannot comment on Gearbox.

      Ride Quality & Handling Ride quality and handling is superb.

      Final Words I liked Hyundai interiors, I wont care much about the interior quality.

      Areas of improvement Things I mentioned in the Cons  can be improved.

      Excellent power steering, good suspension4 seater car, dull interior colors, no steering controls, no usb on audio system,
      Rating parameters(out of 5)
      4

      Exterior/Styles

      2

      Comfort & Space

      5

      Performance (Engine/Gear/Overall)

      3

      Fuel Economy

      2

      Value for Money/Features

      About the Reviewer
      Purchase Not Purchased
      Driven forDid a short drive once
      Was this review helpful?
      Like Button
      25
      DisLike Button
      2
    • Rapivento-Skoda's Vento
      13 years ago | Oggy_O

      Exterior

       It is an edited Vento,but rear gets the Skoda C-Motif on Laura.Its booted version of Fabia

      Interior (Features, Space & Comfort)

       This car is sparesely equipped.Steering controls,USB port,parking sensors and park navigation system plus leather-wrapped steering.The Vento gets these but Rapid gets none of these.It gets only essentials,SD card port,Aux-in port,Climate control,power windows,airbags and ABS.Now,it is comfortable and also spacious,but it does not have the hatch of Superb and Laura.It only gets a regular boot. 

      Engine Performance, Fuel Economy and Gearbox

      The Skoda Rapid has the same 1.6,105 bhp engine and fuel economy in VW Vento,so no diffrentiating.It is only the Fabia's gearbox that makes it different.

      Ride Quality & Handling

       Ride quality is nice and handling too is good.

      Final Words

       Rapid is better than SX4  and Aveo but no match of Verna.It gets less features but is cheaper.so it is better than vERNA 

      Areas of improvement  

       

       Equipment,Aftersales,Boot hatch

      Looks,Skoda Badge,Space,Comfort,Good VFMLess equipment,aftersales network,lacks boot hatch
      Rating parameters(out of 5)
      5

      Exterior/Styles

      5

      Comfort & Space

      4

      Performance (Engine/Gear/Overall)

      5

      Fuel Economy

      4

      Value for Money/Features

      About the Reviewer
      Purchase New
      Driven forFew hundred kilometers
      Mileage12 kmpl
      Was this review helpful?
      Like Button
      4
      DisLike Button
      1
    • Gill skoda onwer
      4 years ago | Jagjit singh
      Am used this car rapid is too good my lovely brand this is very very good my dream next car is Skoda suv top model because this is soild than another brand is very very weak than Skoda.
      Rating parameters(out of 5)
      3

      Exterior/Styles

      4

      Comfort & Space

      5

      Performance (Engine/Gear/Overall)

      5

      Fuel Economy

      4

      Value for Money/Features

      About the Reviewer
      Purchase Used
      Driven forIts my mate since ages
      Was this review helpful?
      Like Button
      0
      DisLike Button
      0
    • Back
    • 1
    • Next

    Reviews you may also consider

    AD
    Write Review
    Write a detailed review of a car and you can
    scissors image
    Win Amazon Voucher worth
     ₹
    2000

    Want to read the reviews for any other car?