Looking for Skoda Rapid [2011-2014]? Here are the reviews and ratings by Rapid [2011-2014] owners from across the country.
Select Your Variant
All Versions
Elegance 1.6 TDI CR MT
Ambition 1.6 TDI CR MT
Ambition 1.6 TDI CR MT Plus
Ambition 1.6 MPI MT
Leisure 1.6 TDI CR MT Plus
Active 1.6 TDI CR MT
Elegance 1.6 MPI AT
Ambition 1.6 MPI MT Plus
Ambition 1.6 TDI CR MT Plus Alloy [2013-2014]
Elegance 1.6 MPI MT [2011-2014]
Active 1.6 MPI MT Plus
Active 1.6 MPI MT
Leisure 1.6 MPI AT
Ambition 1.6 MPI AT
Ultima Elegance 1.6 TDI CR MT
Ultima Ambition 1.6 TDI CR MT Plus
Ambition 1.6 MPI AT Plus
Prestige Ambition 1.6 TDI CR MT Plus
Ambition 1.6 MPI MT Plus Alloy [2013-2014]
Prestige 1.6 TDI CR MT Plus
Ambition 1.6 TDI CR MT
Categories (out of 5)
The car is simply as awesome as its VW sibling. Priced at least 4-5% lesser, it comes as an extremely brilliant option in the segment, and in an era, wherein the Honda City has become an old daddy, this car is simply awesome for the younger generation.
The front looks typically Skoda; the nose, the bonnet, everything. The rich look that Skoda has been giving for decades now is pretty awesome. Extremely brilliant leg room. Beige interiors. Almost similar to Vento. And yes, if you are a 4-spokes steering wheel fan, it has that too (Hardly any car has 4-spokes nowadays...)
Few complaints, though. The engine not as powerful as the City. 70% pick-up as compared to the City(petrol, of course). Gear Box doesn't look all that comfortable. Rest all perfect. Best option though, if you wish to go for Diesel.
Compared to the Verna Fluidic, it has a better engine option at a lesser price. Better mileage, ofcourse. And a much better brand name.
Comfort, Pricing, Exteriors, Interiors, Leg RoomMileage(Petrol), gear boxExterior/Styles
Comfort & Space
Performance (Engine/Gear/Overall)
Fuel Economy
Value for Money/Features
Purchase Not Purchased | Driven forHaven't driven it | Mileage10 kmpl |