3.0 Exterior | 3.0 Comfort | 3.0 Performance |
3.0 Fuel Economy | 2.0 Value for Money |
Exterior Looks like a proper suv with good ground clearence.but built quality n metals used are not that toughlonly looks tough.
Interior (Features, Space & Comfort) Plastic quality,ergonomics doent fit for a car of such high price. Very less value for money. Interoirs looks cheap, design not catchy. Very less features offered. I was waiting for duster and eccosport. Now dropped the idea of duster. Waiting now for eccosport after selling my diesel ritz. I dont knw why people run behind this car. You can get an xuv 500 for this price or atleast go for a scorpio. They are big enough and provides the liberty and flexibility of seven seats and value for ur pay. My friend who was waiting for duster and eccosport jumped for this car becoz he was impatient to wait for eccosport. Now he regrets his decision due to leakage of the car. Yeah, on rainy days the car leaks due to poor sealing of door pads. Imagine my friends mysery after getting a vehicle for nearly 13 lakhs, and as per his opinion the service is also not good enough.
Engine Performance, Fuel Economy and Gearbox Performance is really gud as weight of car is less. enough grunt, good ride, good suspension.
Ride Quality & Handling Have body roll under hard cornering.otherwise ride is quite good.but doesnt have the handling capability of ford.being an owner of ritz n now figo I can easily access the ride difference and built quality of the three companies. Maruti has the worst built strengh.duster traverses in middle path in built quality and strngth.
Final Words Good vehicle if priced less.
Areas of improvement Price, price and price. cannot justify the premium the vehicle is tagged. We Indians seeing something in the form or shape of suv jumps for it without even thinkimg whether the money we are paying is justifiable.
Ride qualityOver priced due to unexpected demand