3.0 Exterior | 1.0 Comfort | 4.0 Performance |
3.0 Fuel Economy | 3.0 Value for Money |
Exterior
looks good.
Interior (Features, Space & Comfort)
very bad interior compared to early releases of same model. i have 2012 model. very cheap & bad plastics used. no comfort even in driver seat. uncomfortable for driving of even 100-200 kms drive.
Engine Performance, Fuel Economy and Gearbox
engine performance is good. got 15-16 km mileage. clutch is hard.
Ride Quality & Handling
Good. because of bad interiors one can not feel the comfortability in the driving.
Final Words
heavy price compared to what maruti is offering for @3.4lac ( on road ).
instead of this going for Nano is better option. we can get it <2.0 lac, >20km mileage. good for city ride. what else Alto is giving more than this ( A big question )
I THINK MARUTI HAD A THOUGHT OF "SUCCESSFUL MODEL AND WE CAN SELL ANYTHING ON ITS NAME". CUSTOMER CAN PURCHASE IT.
not good for long drives. going to home town etc..
Areas of improvement
INTERIOR , AC,
Engine performance, stable drivingvery less space, very very cheap interiors, not good AC