Not a Performance Car as claimed

Exterior Looks Good.

Interior (Features, Space & Comfort) Ok.

Engine Performance is totally poor. Car responds worst in 2nd, 3rd and 4th gears. Wont move beyond 20 Kmph in 2nd gear, 30 kmph in 3rd gear and 40 - 50 kmph in 4th gear. Only performance can be senn in 6th gear. Hence, it can not all be considered as a performance Car for Performance Enthusiasts . Get irritated while driving in Traffics and while overtaking due to the low intial torque. The "Old Verna" was a beutiful performance car. It could achieve 70- 80 kmph even in 2nd gear itself. It was carzy and fun to drive, not this new Fluidic which is a total waste of money for its cost and worth. Dont understand how still Hyundai and in the market this is considered as aperformance car. When I discussed this with Service personnal they say that in order to avoid accients they have reduced the intial torque. This statement is totally unacceptable and is shame on the part of Hyundai. It is claimed by Hyundai  in their website itself "The diesel alternative, a 1.6 U2 CRDi diesel engine with VGT(MT), generates segment best power 128 ps at 4,000 rpm and 26.5 kg·m torque at 1,900 ~ 2,750 rpm. ". This being the statement by Hyundai the question is where is the output. Worst performace and no power.

Ride Quality & Handling Ok.

Final Words OK.

Areas of improvement NA.

Only stylingPoor Initial Torque, feel disgusting to drive in Traffics and while overtaking.