5.0 Exterior | 5.0 Comfort | 4.0 Performance |
1.0 Fuel Economy | 3.0 Value for Money |
Exterior OK.
Interior (Features, Space & Comfort) Good but less comfort as while driving, visiblity is not so clear due front glass reflection due to biege interior.
Engine Performance, Fuel Economy and Gearbox Good engine performance but very bad fuel economy as I got only 9 km/lit even after 1.5 year. I complain at every service for the fuel economy but they are not able to improve, so i have to go for CNG kit in which I got 14km/Kg which is very low in compare to other brand of 1.2l engine. So kindly any body is planning to purchase AT version than running cost will be too expensive and day by day it will be extra burden to you as pertrol is going costlier.
Ride Quality & Handling Driving with AT version gives mental satisfaction and also gives comfort in heavy traffic at the cost of fuel efficiency.
Final Words Better to go for any diesel version or if intrested in AT version than confirm the Gear system whether it is 4 or 5 which makes more difference in mileage.
Areas of improvement Only 4 auto gears are there in AT 1.2 instead of 5 in manual which lowers the fuel efficiency.
good interior & music systemvery bad mileage due to 4 gear in AT & also no special user manual given for AT