5.0 Exterior | 4.0 Comfort | 4.0 Performance |
4.0 Fuel Economy | 4.0 Value for Money |
Exterior New fresh good Looking, My kids too liked on first instance.
Interior (Features, Space & Comfort) Spacious, New Look.
Engine Performance, Fuel Economy and Gearbox Not have driven.
Ride Quality & Handling But if you see the car from far and side, the design ends suddenly towards the rear side, gives an impression that the designer was in hurry to finish the car design and suddenly scrapped out the rear design and had cut it instantly. From front it looks cool. From behind it looks fine, but from sides it gives impression that a part of the vehicle is missing.
Final Words With so much of money spent on design - hunday should have gone for 900-1000 cc engine. I beleive hundai will also go for Kappa with 1 cylinder trimmed (900 cc) in future. Could have reduced Dashboard height for better visibility. (See the failure of Astar). Fuel efficency must be good and Wheel size is fair. Other Wise its ok going for it.
Areas of improvement Rear leg room need to increased.
Style - Interiors, boot space.Tail light too big. Dashboard bit higher for shorter Guys.