CarWale
    AD

    Honda WR-V [2017-2020] User Reviews

    Looking for Honda WR-V [2017-2020]? Here are the reviews and ratings by WR-V [2017-2020] owners from across the country.

    WR-V [2017-2020] Image

    4/5

    230 Ratings

    5 star

    49%

    4 star

    26%

    3 star

    11%

    2 star

    7%

    1 star

    7%

    Variant
    All Versions
    Rs. 8,16,062
    Last recorded price

    Categories (out of 5)

    • 4.3Exterior
    • 4.4Comfort
    • 3.9Performance
    • 4.0Fuel Economy
    • 3.8Value for Money

    All Honda WR-V [2017-2020] Reviews

     (202)
    • All
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    Sort by :
    • All
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    Sort by :
    • 5 years ago | Narendar Kumar
      The only problem with this car is its 1199 cc petrol engine, which is totally inadequate for its heavy body. The engine is very sluggish and it takes time even to attain a speed of 60 kmph. Sometimes it becomes difficult to move it out of the basement parking. I am really scared to take it to hills. It is definitely not a value for money proposition.
      Rating parameters(out of 5)
      3

      Exterior/Styles


      3

      Comfort & Space


      1

      Performance (Engine/Gear/Overall)


      3

      Fuel Economy


      1

      Value for Money/Features

      About the Reviewer
      Purchase New
      Driven forFew thousand kilometers
      Was this review helpful?
      Like Button
      3
      DisLike Button
      0
    • 4 years ago | Gulzarahamed
      In MY W-RV I observed good mileage @ 22 KMPL in city and 24+ with AC on Highway The pick up of the car is very good I feel I selected best now Noise in the cabin so less that one can enjoy music bit in slow volume due to six speakers
      Rating parameters(out of 5)
      5

      Exterior/Styles


      5

      Comfort & Space


      5

      Performance (Engine/Gear/Overall)


      5

      Fuel Economy


      5

      Value for Money/Features

      About the Reviewer
      Purchase New
      Driven forIts my mate since ages
      Was this review helpful?
      Like Button
      3
      DisLike Button
      0
    • 7 years ago | Amitanshu Bal

      Petrol engine is super silent and most refined engine. Both city n highway driving brings lots of feel good factors to driver n passenger. Higher ground clearance gives you additional confidence. Negligible or no body rollover. Excellent NVH level. At present there is no competition in petrol version. Fuel economy is 14-17 depending upon city or long way (Driven only 1900Km driving). This car is for people who need a good family car with smooth specious and long driving experience. 3 years / Unlimited Kms Basic Warranty is also a solid confidence booster.  Yes, Honda price is higher as compared to Hyundai or Maruti but at same time you also get many feel good factors too. I have choosen this over Baleno Alfa and i20 Active.

      Areas of improvement S variant need a reverse parking sensor and option to go for touch screen AVN. Also require some more basic illumination inside car.

      This is superb value package of refined petrol engine, masculine look, brand reputation and amazingPrice is in little higher side. 1200CC Petrol engine feels little lethargic during initial RPM. S va
      Rating parameters(out of 5)
      4

      Exterior/Styles


      5

      Comfort & Space


      3

      Performance (Engine/Gear/Overall)


      4

      Fuel Economy


      4

      Value for Money/Features

      About the Reviewer
      Purchase New
      Driven forFew thousand kilometers
      Mileage15 kmpl
      Was this review helpful?
      Like Button
      4
      DisLike Button
      2
    • 7 years ago | Kapil l hemrajani
      I buy last month petrol wrv ivtec car no have pickup when u sit 5 person in car & go long drive is tomuch bad experience This car not go properly to lonavala tiger point or mahableshwar i think this is waste of money in this range have so many car When u buy please check the pickup mileage also not more then 9 kmpl .
      Rating parameters(out of 5)
      3

      Exterior/Styles


      4

      Comfort & Space


      1

      Performance (Engine/Gear/Overall)


      1

      Fuel Economy


      1

      Value for Money/Features

      About the Reviewer
      Purchase New
      Driven forFew hundred kilometers
      Was this review helpful?
      Like Button
      3
      DisLike Button
      1
    • 7 years ago | ALOK

      Exterior Focussing of Head light of HONDA WRV are very poor. On low beam, lights are focussing on left side and visibility is poor. As per serive center in Gandhidahm, no provision is provided to adjst the alignment. Honda serives are very poor, no care for customer satisfacton though the service charges are higher in thsi segment. Honda shall learn from Toyota for customer services.

      Interior (Features, Space & Comfort) Good.

      Engine Performance, Fuel Economy and Gearbox Fuel average shown on displlays does not match with actual fuel consumed. Display is always 10 % more.

      Ride Quality & Handling Ride quality is good, vehicle is stable even at 140 Km speed.

      Final Words Drive is smooth, body is strong.

      Areas of improvement Head light, back seat, AC VENT, BACK SEAT CONMFORT, Rear AC vent, Head rest for back seat, Proper locking for cover provided on lock of back door, Improvement required for smoothening of gear box, Additional features like outside temperature, engine temperature required, Fog light shall be essental in all model, Rear view camera or sensors shall be included in all the models.

      Good on highways drivingPoor head light
      Rating parameters(out of 5)
      4

      Exterior/Styles


      3

      Comfort & Space


      4

      Performance (Engine/Gear/Overall)


      3

      Fuel Economy


      3

      Value for Money/Features

      About the Reviewer
      Purchase New
      Driven forFew thousand kilometers
      Mileage18 kmpl
      Was this review helpful?
      Like Button
      2
      DisLike Button
      0
    • 5 years ago | Bk
      I have purchased the stupid car at 11lakh but is not worth ..u still have any idea of buying this car .. so please ignore it .the millage is very worst it gives only 10/lit in city drive. The cost is too high but the performance is so bad. I am so disappointed with this car.
      Rating parameters(out of 5)
      4

      Exterior/Styles


      5

      Comfort & Space


      2

      Performance (Engine/Gear/Overall)


      1

      Fuel Economy


      3

      Value for Money/Features

      About the Reviewer
      Purchase New
      Driven forFew thousand kilometers
      Was this review helpful?
      Like Button
      2
      DisLike Button
      0
    • 5 years ago | Hoshiyar Singh
      maine 24-10-2019 ko golden brown colour ki wr v model vmt book karvai thi jo aaj tak pace honda rewari ne mujhe kisi aur colour ki bhi gadi nahi di hai so sabse bekar co. hai jab gadi hi nahi de rahe hai or yadi gadi de bhi di to iska kya bhrosa hai ke bhavisya main ye gadi ki service aadi bhi thik thak denge. So main to kahunga ye honda co. ki koi bhi gadi na le. leni hai to hyundai co. ki gadi le jiski hyundai wale bahut ijjat karte hai aur time to time service bhi badia dete hai.
      Rating parameters(out of 5)
      1

      Exterior/Styles


      1

      Comfort & Space


      1

      Performance (Engine/Gear/Overall)


      1

      Fuel Economy


      1

      Value for Money/Features

      About the Reviewer
      Purchase Not Purchased
      Driven forHaven't driven it
      Was this review helpful?
      Like Button
      2
      DisLike Button
      0
    • 4 years ago | Barath
      Honda WRV Diesel.... the best of this segment..it has all the features required...fuel economy... comfort... safety... love this car...it is more of a family vehicle... Unlike Eco sport...where we can enjoy performance...
      Rating parameters(out of 5)
      5

      Exterior/Styles


      5

      Comfort & Space


      4

      Performance (Engine/Gear/Overall)


      5

      Fuel Economy


      5

      Value for Money/Features

      About the Reviewer
      Purchase New
      Driven forFew thousand kilometers
      Was this review helpful?
      Like Button
      2
      DisLike Button
      0
    • 7 years ago | Sandeep Kumar

      Exterior The road presence of the vehicle is bad, you have to convince yourself it looks good.The front is OK but the rear and sides require a better shape. At 11 lakhs for the top end it should not look like a hatchback.

      Interior (Features, Space & Comfort) Wonderful.

      Engine Performance, Fuel Economy and Gearbox Fuel Economy is good, but the engine lacks power. It does not have an SUV feel. It looks more of a hatchback on a raised platform. Seeing it in the showroom is deceptive and on the road it lacks the premium feel you pay for it.

      Ride Quality & Handling The car takes time to get into full swing

      Final Words Need to be atleast a lakh or two lower in price, there is no point claiming 25km/hour when the sales team itself suggests 18- 20 km/l, but that problem I believe exists with all cars across.

      Areas of improvement Exteriors , the back and sides are not impressive. The option of black has to be explored, which is not there in the WR-V. The rear lights look old fashioned. Need to be more stylish.

      Spacious and beautiful interiorsDoes not have a road presence
      Rating parameters(out of 5)
      3

      Exterior/Styles


      5

      Comfort & Space


      3

      Performance (Engine/Gear/Overall)


      5

      Fuel Economy


      1

      Value for Money/Features

      About the Reviewer
      Purchase Not Purchased
      Driven forDid a short drive once
      Mileage20 kmpl
      Was this review helpful?
      Like Button
      2
      DisLike Button
      1
    • 7 years ago | Pratik

      Exterior Really cool, refreshing a head turner.

      Interior (Features, Space & Comfort) Best in segment overall.

      Engine Performance, Fuel Economy and Gearbox Its good but i think the bhp should have been atleast 110, maybe next version may have it increased, but still better than brezza, drove brezza with 4 onboard it doesnt pull fair it felt as dull, drove wrv with same 4 onboard power is better in all gears, maruti's diesel engines below 2000 rpm feels damped and all then all of a sudden its zippy which is not good, plus 1258 cc doesnot do justice in pulling more wieght. honda cars come very close to arai feul efficiency figures and wrv is no different. gear liver is sporty and throws are slick.

      Ride Quality & Handling Relatively lower ground clearence yet enough for indian roads the ride and handling is good, amazing suspension for front but ok at rear as its a drivers car.

      Final Words Overall vfm and its better than its rival in maximum scenarios.

      Areas of improvement Little piano finish materials should make dash look good and glove box shld be air cooled.

      design, space, mielage, engineground clearence should have been atleast 195+,60:40 seats missing, rear arm rest missing
      Rating parameters(out of 5)
      4

      Exterior/Styles


      5

      Comfort & Space


      4

      Performance (Engine/Gear/Overall)


      5

      Fuel Economy


      4

      Value for Money/Features

      About the Reviewer
      Purchase Not Purchased
      Driven forDid a short drive once
      Mileage22 kmpl
      Was this review helpful?
      Like Button
      2
      DisLike Button
      1

    Reviews you may also consider

    AD
    Write Review
    Write a detailed review of a car and you can
    scissors image
    Win Amazon Voucher worth
     ₹
    2000

    Want to read the reviews for any other car?