4.0 Exterior | 4.0 Comfort | 1.0 Performance |
1.0 Fuel Economy | 1.0 Value for Money |
Exterior Good looks better than comparable vehicles,great coulurs,
Interior (Features, Space & Comfort) Interiors are decent ,reasonably spacious, seats are very comfortable.
Engine Performance, Fuel Economy and Gearbox Horrible, a lot to be improved. It seems Quality of parts are very poor.Its very noisy and struggles to pull when fully occupied. Ok for a short city drive but not on long tours ,covering few hundred kms in single stretch with six passsengers .It really struggles at 100 km speed. Noise increases at higher speed.
I dont understand that a Popular car like Honda can break down midway within 12000 kms of its running over a period of six months. whereas a car like Maruti Alto is running for more than 10 years without big problems.It never broke down in its journey of80000 kms over a period of 10 years. I will rate Maruti Alto .Fiat Palio performed for me much better on long journeys. And you can't compare Skoda Rapid which has the best mileage in the long run though belongs to a different segment.
Ride Quality & Handling Short journey -ok. Long tours covering a thousand kms -It does not perform.
Final Words Honda should call back all problematic mobilios and do real thourough check of its engine performance along with clutch and Gearbox.
Areas of improvement Engine and allied parts.
great exterior looks.poor quality parts,very noisy.