3.0 इक्सटीरियर | 5.0 आरामदेह | 3.0 परफ़ॉर्मेंस |
5.0 फ़्यूल इकॉनमी | 1.0 पैसा वसूल |
Exterior The road presence of the vehicle is bad, you have to convince yourself it looks good.The front is OK but the rear and sides require a better shape. At 11 lakhs for the top end it should not look like a hatchback.
Interior (Features, Space & Comfort) Wonderful.
Engine Performance, Fuel Economy and Gearbox Fuel Economy is good, but the engine lacks power. It does not have an SUV feel. It looks more of a hatchback on a raised platform. Seeing it in the showroom is deceptive and on the road it lacks the premium feel you pay for it.
Ride Quality & Handling The car takes time to get into full swing
Final Words Need to be atleast a lakh or two lower in price, there is no point claiming 25km/hour when the sales team itself suggests 18- 20 km/l, but that problem I believe exists with all cars across.
Areas of improvement Exteriors , the back and sides are not impressive. The option of black has to be explored, which is not there in the WR-V. The rear lights look old fashioned. Need to be more stylish.
Spacious and beautiful interiorsDoes not have a road presence