टाटा टिगोर vs शेवरले ऑप्ट्रा [2005-2007]

7 Ratings

1 Rating

Ride the Tiger- the Tigor

My showroom experience was superb. The dealer even helped me get my BH number plate within 2 days. About the car, the experience is indescribable. On highways the fuel economy even reached 27 km/l. The build quality of TATA is incomparable. On road, Tigor gives superb driving confidence. Overall super happy with Tata and Tigor.

worst car in this segment

<p><strong>Exterior</strong></p> <p>&nbsp;Good&nbsp;&nbsp; 'BUT DON'T GO BY SIMPLY LOOKS LOOK FOR PERFORMANCE exterior start getting rusted after 2 years 'Body sheet&nbsp; used is of very thin and of poor quality</p> <p><strong>Interior (Features, Space &amp; Comfort)</strong></p> <p><strong>Engine Performance, Fuel Economy in looks&nbsp;and Gearbox</strong></p> <p>&nbsp;POOR gives only 5-6 km/ltr.</p> <p><strong>Ride Quality &amp; Handling</strong></p> <p>&nbsp;fair</p> <p><strong>Final Words</strong></p> <p>&nbsp;DONT WAIST MONEY JUST FOR NAME OF GM .TAKE MY WORDS I AM ACTUAL USER&nbsp;AND A SUFFERER OF&nbsp;CHEVY OPTRA&nbsp; it IS REALLY BAD . NOT WORTH FOR PRICE BAD AFTERSALES SERVICE AND BAD PERFORMANCE. THERE AFTERSALES 3 YEAR CONTRACT IS JUST A EYE WASH.DEALERS&nbsp;AVOID REPLACEING PARTS DURING WARRANTY PERIOD AND MOMENT WARRANTY IS OVER YOU WILL FIND YOU NEED REPLACEMENT FOR ALL IMPORTANT PARTS.TILL DATE I FEEL SORRY FOR DECIDING FOR OPTRA CHEVORLET.PETROL</p> <p><strong>Areas of improvement</strong>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;IN ALL DEPARTMENTS SPECIALLY IN FUEL ECONOMY AND BODY QUALITY.HAVE KEPT SO FAR 9 CARS IN ALL BUT YET TOO SEE BAD QUALITY AS OF CHEVEORLET OPTRA.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p>good stylethis car is good for max 2 years thereafter itsbody get rusted suspension is finish low fuel milag