रेनो क्विड vs महिंद्रा kuv100 [2016-2017]

26 Ratings

6 Ratings

Okay choice

Driving experience was not up to mark as we compared with Tata Tiago, Maruti and other entry-level car. Internal space was very good however build quality is not up to mark and not safe car for highway drive

Rohan Gupta

<p><strong>Exterior</strong> Very good</p> <p><strong>Interior (Features, Space &amp; Comfort)</strong> Front leg space good but rear leg space is less when front seats are pushed backwards to the max&nbsp;</p> <p><strong>Engine Performance, Fuel Economy and Gearbox</strong> Am driving petrol version and do not find any engine problem but yes it is having poor fuel economy. Have drvien 8000 kms since september 2016 but am getting only 6-7 kms/litre.</p> <p><strong>Ride Quality &amp; Handling</strong> Fairly good</p> <p><strong>Final Words</strong>&nbsp;</p> <p><strong>Areas of improvement</strong></p> <p>1. Fuel economy needs to be improved and it should atleast give 15 kms/ litre.</p> <p>2. The clutch paddle is wrongly placed for a 5 feet 10 inch individual like me. My knees are in awkward position while pressing and removing my foot from clutch paddle as my knees touch middle dashboard.&nbsp;</p> <p>3. While taking right turns from driver side, the view is blocked due to vertical rails and rear mirror positions. The vertical rails of the car and the rear mirror block the view to such an extent that on blind right turns I had several chances of accidents especially with scooterists, pedestrians and cyclists as they just crop up from nowwhere within a fraction.&nbsp;</p> <p>4. Tank lid needs to be opened with coins and pins.</p>U r driving a SUV at the cost of Alto. Spacious, good AC comfort, Good overall controlpoor fuel economy, less boot space, less leg space for rear seats