carwale आपके लिए महिंद्रा XUV 3XO और निसान टेरानो [2013-2017] की तुलना लेकर आया है।महिंद्रा XUV 3XO की क़ीमत Rs. 9.31 लाख है।और निसान टेरानो [2013-2017] की क़ीमत है Rs. 10.11 लाख. The महिंद्रा XUV 3XO is available in 1197 cc engine with 1 fuel type options: पेट्रोल और निसान टेरानो [2013-2017] is available in 1461 cc engine with 1 fuel type options: डीज़ल. XUV 3XO provides the mileage of 18.89 किमी प्रति लीटर और टेरानो [2013-2017] provides the mileage of 20.5 किमी प्रति लीटर.
मुख्य बिंदू | XUV 3XO | टेरानो [2013-2017] |
---|---|---|
प्राइस | Rs. 9.31 लाख | Rs. 10.11 लाख |
इंजन की क्षमता | 1197 cc | 1461 cc |
पावर | 110 bhp | 84 bhp |
ट्रैंस्मिशन | मैनुअल | मैनुअल |
फ़्यूल टाइप | पेट्रोल | डीज़ल |
एमजी एस्टर
फ़ाइनेंस | लोन ऑफ़र्स पाएं |
स्टील्थ ब्लैक | सफ़ायर ब्लैक | औरोरा सिल्वर | ||
Nebula Blue | स्टर्लिंग ग्रे | कैंडी वाइट | ||
गैलेक्सी ग्रे | ब्रोंज़ ग्रे | |||
डीप फ़ॉरेस्ट | फ़ायर रेड | |||
Dune Beige | ब्लेड सिल्वर | |||
टैंगो रेड | पर्ल वाइट | |||
एवरेस्ट वाइट |
कुल रेटिंग | 4.7/5 91 Ratings | 4.3/5 6 Ratings | 4.8/5 16 Ratings |
रेटिंग का मापदंड | 4.6इक्सटीरियर | 4.8इक्सटीरियर | 5.0इक्सटीरियर | |
4.6आरामदेह | 4.5आरामदेह | 4.7आरामदेह | ||
4.7परफ़ॉर्मेंस | 4.5परफ़ॉर्मेंस | 4.6परफ़ॉर्मेंस | ||
4.3फ़्यूल इकॉनमी | 4.7फ़्यूल इकॉनमी | 4.0फ़्यूल इकॉनमी | ||
4.6पैसा वसूल | 4.5पैसा वसूल | 4.7पैसा वसूल |
सबसे उपयोगी रिव्यू | Overall excellent The Interior of the car should be in black colour with chrome framing, and I request to Mahindra to provide finance facility at a low interest rate so that more and more people purchase this car. | Terrano Will overtake Duster <p><strong>Exterior</strong> Exterior made me attracted compared to Duster which had some thing incomplete in style. Looks premium than Duster, especially I like the wheel cover front grill(taken from Nissan Patrol) rear door etc. From all angles the vehicle looks really nice. From side view it is similar to Duster.</p> <p><strong>Interior (Features, Space & Comfort)</strong> I felt front AC vent has improved design, plastic quality little but not that much rest is the same like Duster.</p> <p><strong>Engine Performance, Fuel Economy and Gearbox</strong> Engine sound some what reduced compared to Duster. Fuel economy is good from my initial Ride, Gear box there is an improvement in 2 and 3 rd gear compared to Duster.</p> <p><strong>Ride Quality & Handling</strong> Awesome ride quality and handling, but during overtake I need to shift to 4th Gear which I felt some thing difficult but better than Duster.</p> <p><strong>Final Words</strong> If your budget is 11 ~ 14 better go for this car since this is improved version of Duster. If the budget is tight better go for Duster.</p> <p><strong>Areas of improvement</strong> Price has to be less.</p>Good stylePrice | Good featured car All are good Pros: driving is very smooth, boot space, handling. Sprint variant is value for Money, getting all options which are needed. Cons: Mileage in the city, back seat thigh support |