शेवरले एविओ u-va [2006-2012] यूज़र रिव्यूज़

Exterior: Its a very stylish in its segment n very cometative... as compared now is not that gr8 yes but min graphics can make it eye catching

Interior (Features, Space & Comfort): Almost have all the features for a normal comfort in its class interiors are good, nice finishing, nice cushioning an the seats.

Engine Performance, Fuel Economy and Gearbox: Engine is good but even bit of over exceleration makes bad noise n feels like sm truck but overall i have driven the car to 160Kmph n it still runs like a horse without any big noise. pickup is not that gr8, fuel economy is very good 15.5 kmpl on a highway and 12.5 -13 in city traffic,  bad reverse gear gets stuck8/10 times.

Ride Quality & Handling: Driving is pure plesure in its class, very comfortable n easy to handel even ata high speed. good suspentions n bad roads are not a very big deal.

Final Words: value for money

Areas of improvement : Gearbox.

I purchased a UVA-LT model recently in Bangalore after a great deal of deliberation and  exploring websites like car-wale, autocar, zigwheels, what car etc,etc. I hope my experience will help other prospective car buyers who are quite confused with the wide choice available (as I was!) to make up their minds and decide on which vehicle would suit them best. Frankly, as most reviews by experts indicate, practically every car/model is excellent in it’s own way & no one would recommend one car over another. So let me start by defining what I wanted in my new car which helped me narrow down my choice:

1) I am 62 years of age& am finding it increasingly difficult to drive larger cars in Bangalore’s crazy traffic- not to mention parking problems- decided on a  hatch.

2) My use is restricted to about 20 Kms/day in the city on an average with occasional long distance drives. Hence decided on petrol.

3) Don’t need too much power- comfort , economy & safety are higher priorities. The “premium” hatches offer more space, so did not look at the smaller hatches.

4) Will be retiring soon- fuel consumption & cost of owning & maintaining the car were crucial factors.

5) Cost of the car- best value for money.

I narrowed down the choice to Ritz , Fabia, Punto and finally the UVA. I was quite inclined towards the Fabia at first because of the excellent build quality & classy interiors. The test drive was good but what finally put me off was the price-just could not afford the extra lakh! The Punto 1.2 l petrol is available only in the basic version and so tried out the 1.4 l .Enjoyed the test drive, but the interiors in my opinion could have been better. Also, there was an element of doubt w.r.t the fuel efficiency plus my experience with the service of Tata dealers was not very pleasant. I did like the feel of the Ritz-good driving position, smooth engine & transmission . I did not care too much for the looks but it does not matter when you are inside! I thought the final choice would be between the Ritz or the Punto and then thought I would check out the UVA . I was in for a very pleasant surprise starting from the response of the sales staff. The car matched  my requirements and though not zippy, gave me a good confident feel the moment I got behind the steering.The ride quality is fantastic and you can barely hear the engine. It is still too early to comment on the fuel efficiency & the performance, but since I do not use the A.C much, I am confident of getting 12~13 Kms/ltr.Added to this  is the 3 year cashless maintenance offer -coupled with the 3 year warranty, this car is absolute value for money. I hope the performance over the next few months justifies my choice.

Hi frnz, I bought my chevy UVA on june 2009 and have drove 20k in both city, high way and off roads (trust me, Athirappally to Valparai road could only consider so). Over all its freat car i this segment, you wont feel disappointed, choosing it.

1, very big car in this segment.

2, comfortable and very spacious

3,amazing control in higher speeds

4,good mileage

5,good resale value (rarely you will find an used UVA for sale)

6,geares are very smooth except reverse gear

7,breaking is awsome but i heared some vehicls have problem with ABS (no idea)

8, lower turning ratio comparing to its size

9,very good handling

10, good A/C

11, effective lights

12, service is very cheap especially if you take 3 year extended warranty (thanks to GM) do ot compromise to a 15K off instead of extended warranty;its really worths.

 over all good value for money

AS A COIN HAS TWO SIDES LET ME STATE THE SECOND SIDE ALSO.

1,initial pick up is very bad, once you pressed the break pedel you would need to wait little long or have to go higher gears

2,you will find little problem to find the horn while driveing in rush traffic or narrow turnings

3,reverse gear is little difficult come in hand, some times you may need to put first gear and make small move ahead.

4,an irritating noice from engine if you press accelator pedel little more than required

5,front arch is obstucting the right cornor vision especially in sharp right bends

Thats all guys, i drove my UVA at an average 50 kms speed in damn bad jungle road of Athirappally to Valparia and back(Kerala Tamilnad border) to and from Ernakulam arround 400 kms with in 13 hours, and i was not even a bit tired.

What is 1.2 duel??

UVA LT 1.2, Swift ZXi 1.2, i20 Asta, Micra XV, Expensive i20 was dumped out, next was Swift due to looks, interiors and expensive price, Micra also was quite costly. Other options 1st UVA LT, 2nd Vista Aura +, 3rd Ritz ZXI, 4th Skoda Fabia Elegance, Expensive Fabia, Flimsy Ritz, Staid Vista, Slightly slow UVA But - UVA is the winner!!!!

Exteriors It is so cute, like i10 Kappa2/Punto 1.4. Not dull or dated as Figo/Swift. The back side is slightly boxy,but otherwise elegant. Smart alloys. The tyres can be a bit wider but are ok.

Interior (Features, Space & Comfort) Interiors are beige which are cheerful and beautiful. A CD Player is missing but otherwise ok features like lumbar support for seats and Parcel-Tray,and all basic features like all-door power windows,power steering and manual AC. Manual AC does not dissapoint either as much,it is ok for such a good value car. Boot is decent for city,and it is just better than WagonR/Beat/Ritz/Spark. The front seats are so generous,the back seats are not bad either.

Engine Performance, Fuel Economy and Gearbox Engine is a bit slow at low revs but quick and 75 PS not too bad.Just good figures for 1.2 litre engine. Fuel efficiency  is more than adequate. Gear is light and fun.

Ride Quality & Handling Ride is sporty but handling not as good.

Final Words UVA is cute. Go for it. It is the small Aveo and engine is great. Maintenace is superb.

Areas of improvement Handling is not good,slightly slow on low revs.