Looking for Datsun GO [2014-2018]? Here are the reviews and ratings by GO [2014-2018] owners from across the country.
Select Your Variant
All Versions
T
A EPS
A [2014-2017]
D1
Remix Edition
T (O)
D
Categories (out of 5)
Exterior/Styles
Comfort & Space
Performance (Engine/Gear/Overall)
Fuel Economy
Value for Money/Features
Purchase New | Driven forFew thousand kilometers |
I am Sajith S Kumar. I have purchased Datsun Go AEPS model from trivandrum, kerala, India on 16th feb 2017. The dealer name is Marikar. I want to say that i am really disappointed with the delivered car. Being a world renowned Company, Nissan should have given basic covering for the car interiors. The car interiors are not fully covered, mostly left open. When I complained it to the dealer they said the base model car comes like this, higher end variant is coming with the interiors covered.
Only Nissan have offer something like this, basic covering of car interiors comes with the higher end variant only. The dealer shows car with fully covered in the showroom and explains nothing about these remarks and the customer knows only at the time of delivery. I have purchased from other companies also Hyundai and Maruti and they have given the car in excellent condition but this is the worst experience. I have given the complaint to a customer executive who called from Nissan India to know my review about the car, he said he registered the complaint still nothing yet been done. Totally disappointed. So please do check all interior coverings.
Powerful Engine, SpacingInterior designing, Interiors not coveredExterior/Styles
Comfort & Space
Performance (Engine/Gear/Overall)
Fuel Economy
Value for Money/Features
Purchase New | Driven forFew hundred kilometers |
Exterior Excellent.
Interior (Features, Space & Comfort) Good comfort & space ( both seating & boot space), Digital clock missing, rear Viper & Defogger missing even in top model, Accessories hard to find in market ( only available at showroom / service center).
Engine Performance, Fuel Economy and Gearbox Smooth drive quality but less Fuel economy in city drive (13 kmpl).
Ride Quality & Handling Good ride quality, easy handling.
Final Words Definitely go for it if you are not mileage concious. Value for money in comfort, space, ride quality, handling, looks, interior. The exterior look is better than the old-styled Alto family.
Areas of improvement Mileage, outer noise in-cabin, power window in A-EPS model. CNG version awaited, rear-view mirror without anti-glare, ORVM should be inside controlled, please change the door handles (tight to open & should be body coloured instead of black), manually operated door mirrors. Basic rear view mirror - no night setting.Open glove compartment.
Interior, exterior looks, Smooth gear shift , drive quality, power steering , Comfort , Boot spaceOuter noise in-cabin, Fuel economy ( in-city ), tight door handles, Accessories un-availabilityExterior/Styles
Comfort & Space
Performance (Engine/Gear/Overall)
Fuel Economy
Value for Money/Features
Purchase New | Driven forDid a short drive once | Mileage13 kmpl |
Simple one word, even this car is not comparing with 10 years old lower version cars from other companies like Maruthi & Hyundai. This is the worst car and never come in the feature. 1. Horrible to drive in traffic 2. No pickup (even Tata Nano is better then this) 3. Poor quality of car body (full noise, we need to cover with audio sound, if you can put bit high volume doors are vibrate) 4. There is a only one back light on revers gear (cost-cutting) Thanks, P V Pratap. 99***4**4.
NANAExterior/Styles
Comfort & Space
Performance (Engine/Gear/Overall)
Fuel Economy
Value for Money/Features
Purchase New | Driven forFew thousand kilometers |
Exterior Looking super.
Interior (Features, Space & Comfort) space, seatings are comfortable, Good comfort & space ( both seating & boot space), Digital clock missing, rear Viper & Defogger missing even in top model, Accessories hard to find in market ( only available at showroom / service center).
Engine Performance, Fuel Economy and Gearbox fuel economy very poor, engine perfomance is good, very good breaking system.
Ride Quality & Handling It is fine.
Final Words Good car with poor millage for this cost (Definitely go for it if you are not mileage concious. Value for money in comfort, space, ride quality, handling, looks, interior. The exterior look is better than the old-styled Alto family).
Areas of improvement Improve the seat quality(foam) especially for rear seats, not enough lighting(head light) and cabin light, center lock, tash board locking
Wheel covers(the basic model cars also have wheel covers) Mileage, outer noise in-cabin, power window in A-EPS model. CNG version awaited, rear-view mirror without anti-glare, ORVM should be inside controlled.
Poor fuel economy (most expensive)SHOULD NOT CONTAIN BASIC ACCESSORIES LIKE DIGITAL CLOCK,REAR WIPPER Etc.,Exterior/Styles
Comfort & Space
Performance (Engine/Gear/Overall)
Fuel Economy
Value for Money/Features
Purchase New | Driven forFew hundred kilometers | Mileage13 kmpl |
Exterior/Styles
Comfort & Space
Performance (Engine/Gear/Overall)
Fuel Economy
Value for Money/Features
Purchase Not Purchased | Driven forDid a short drive once |