CarWale
Doodle Image-1Doodle Image-2Doodle Image-3Doodle Image-4
    AD

    Honda WR-V [2017-2020] vs Maruti Suzuki Vitara Brezza [2016-2020] vs Ford EcoSport [2015-2017]

    CarWale brings you comparison of Honda WR-V [2017-2020], Maruti Suzuki Vitara Brezza [2016-2020] and Ford EcoSport [2015-2017]. The Honda WR-V [2017-2020] price is Rs. 10.46 Lakh, Maruti Suzuki Vitara Brezza [2016-2020] price is Rs. 10.02 Lakh and Ford EcoSport [2015-2017] price is Rs. 10.40 Lakh. WR-V [2017-2020] provides the mileage of 25.5 kmpl, Vitara Brezza [2016-2020] provides the mileage of 24.29 kmpl and EcoSport [2015-2017] provides the mileage of 22.27 kmpl.

    WR-V [2017-2020] vs Vitara Brezza [2016-2020] vs EcoSport [2015-2017] Comparison Overview

    Key HighlightsWR-V [2017-2020] Vitara Brezza [2016-2020] EcoSport [2015-2017]
    PriceRs. 10.46 LakhRs. 10.02 LakhRs. 10.40 Lakh
    Engine Capacity1498 cc1248 cc1498 cc
    Power99 bhp89 bhp99 bhp
    TransmissionManualManualManual
    Fuel TypeDieselDieselDiesel
    Honda WR-V [2017-2020]
    Rs. 10.46 Lakh
    Last Recorded Price
    VS
    Maruti Suzuki Vitara Brezza [2016-2020]
    Rs. 10.02 Lakh
    Last Recorded Price
    VS
    Ford EcoSport [2015-2017]
    Ford EcoSport [2015-2017]
    Titanium+ 1.5L TDCi
    Rs. 10.40 Lakh
    Last Recorded Price
    VS
    Select Car
    Select Car
    VS
    VS
    Ford EcoSport [2015-2017]
    Titanium+ 1.5L TDCi
    VS
    Select Car
    Select Car
    • SPECIFICATIONS
    • FEATURES
    • BROCHURE
    • COLOURS
    • USER REVIEWS
        • SPECIFICATIONS
        • FEATURES
        • BROCHURE
        • COLOURS
        • USER REVIEWS

            Specifications and Finance

            Finance
            Loading...
            Loading...
            Loading...
            Loading...
            Loading...
            Loading...
            • Engine & Transmission
            • Dimensions & Weight
            • Capacity
            • Suspensions, Brakes, Steering & Tyres

            Features

            • Safety
            • Braking & Traction
            • Locks & Security
            • Comfort & Convenience
            • Seats & Upholstery
            • Storage
            • Doors, Windows, Mirrors & Wipers
            • Exterior
            • Lighting
            • Instrumentation
            • Entertainment, Information & Communication
            • Manufacturer Warranty

            Colours

            Modern Steel Metallic
            Granite Grey
            Kinetic Blue
            Golden Brown Metallic
            Premium Silver
            Panther Black
            Radiant Red Metallic
            Blazing Red
            Smoke Grey
            Premium Amber Metallic
            Pearl Arctic White
            Golden Bronze
            Lunar Silver Metallic
            Mars Red
            White Orchid Pearl
            Moondust Silver
            Diamond White

            User Reviews

            Overall Rating

            4.2/5

            69 Ratings

            4.2/5

            92 Ratings

            4.1/5

            12 Ratings

            Rating Parameters

            4.3Exterior

            4.4Exterior

            4.3Exterior

            4.5Comfort

            4.2Comfort

            3.9Comfort

            4.3Performance

            4.0Performance

            4.2Performance

            4.5Fuel Economy

            4.3Fuel Economy

            4.0Fuel Economy

            4.1Value for Money

            4.2Value for Money

            4.0Value for Money

            Most Helpful Review

            Little higher on the cost but a good car!

            <p>Purchase Date: 15th Oct 2017</p> <p>Driven? 5000+ kms<br/>Fuel Type? Diesel I've been using this car for about 4 months now and have driven close to 6000kms and hence I've decided to write a review about my new Honda WRV i-DTEC VX.</p> <p>I've researched a lot, compared a lot and read a lot of reviews (Brezza,ecoSport and WRV) and finally decided to go with Honda WRV. (no regrets till date).</p> <p>Look and Feel &amp; Comfort:</p> <p>Initially I felt that the cabin is not properly insulated as I could hear the rattling diesel engine sound but now am used to it. If you have a family with tall people then this is car is meant for you. WRV beats the competition when it comes legroom. The boot space is also pretty good and usable. The drivability is good in both city and highway conditions. The body built quality is way too better than the competition (Brezza,Nexon etc).</p> <p>Features:</p> <p>The car is WiFi enabled and has a HDMI port as well. (you can mirror your phone screen with the help of a Micro USB to HDMI cable). The cruise mode is a boon if you are on long drives and want to relax on a decent 4-lane/6-lane highway. The default speakers and audio system are pretty good. There is no aux port. The default navigation app is very basic but if you want you can install the Google Maps application which is quite helpful. The auto-air-condition does very good job in maintaining the preset temperature. The sun/moon roof is a big advantage if you have kids, it lets in additional light and air into the car while on highways.</p> <p>Mileage and maintenance:</p> <p>I have tested the mileage in all possible ways by travelling in multiple traffic conditions. Tested it in bumper to bumper traffic conditions (distance of 19kms in 90-100mins time) and also in moderately smooth traffic. Even tested the mileage on highways by taming the tank and by cruelly zooming the car as well. I have mentioned the figures below. The maintenance cost is very minimal (at least during the free servicing period).</p> <p>Mileage:</p> <p>City? 16~19 kmpl (depending on bumper to bumper traffic or smooth traffic)<br/>Highway? 20~24 kmpl (depending upon your driving style).</p> <p>PROS:</p> <p>- Good mileage<br/>- Great pickup<br/>- Very stable at high speeds (120+kmph)<br/>- Good speakers<br/>- Ample of legroom for all passengers (especially rear seat passengers)<br/>- Sunroof/moon roof<br/>- Great build quality<br/>- Cruise mode<br/>- WiFi enabled (car can connect to a WiFi dongle or mobile hotspot)<br/>-</p> <p>CONS:</p> <p>- Slightly pricy (but worth it)<br/>- Touchscreen infotainment system can have much better software (they are using Andorid 2.1 version)<br/>- Slightly noisy cabin (engine sound can be heard from inside the car)<br/>- Does not support Android Auto<br/>- Arm-rest not height adjustable<br/>- Missing rear arm rest<br/>- Missing rear AC went (but never really felt the need for it)<br/>- Touch screen response is laggy at times<br/>- Missing aux cable port</p> <p><strong>Final Verdict:</strong> If you are ready to spend a little more for better build quality and a safer vehicle then definitely go for WRV!</p>Good looks, nice pickup and seating comfortPricy, laggy touch screen and no aux cable port

            I had booked Immediately Vitara Brezza on the launch date with out taking Test drive . It looks grea

            I had booked Immediately Vitara Brezza on the launch date with out taking Test drive . It looks great from the front like Range rover, But I took the test drive for 3 times sitting and rear seat and front driving. Then the real fact of the Brezza comes out. Rear seat ride quality very very poor same u feel your sitting in an Auto. shocks very poor , Car jumps like a toy car you will get back ache you cannot travel for long distance .Infact Swift , Swift D zire, Ciaz was far far better in ride comfort at rear seat. I think if Brezza want to stay in market for long time they should recitify this rear seat comfortness interms of shocks and no thigh support. mileage 13 ok good later wil touch 17 not bad . rear seat comfortness very very poor , drive on mud road you will get clear picture. Hyundai I 20 , Duster, Creta was far better. I am going to cancel and Book Creta or Duster or Terrano instead of Vitara brezza . DONOT WASTE YOU R HARD EARNED MONEY FOR BUYING BREZZA . STOP BUYING LET MARUTI DO SOME HOME WORK AND RECTIFIY THE REAR SEAT ISSUE IF THEY WANT TO STAY IN MARKET FOR LONG TIME. GOOD LUCK MARUTI LEARN FROM TOYOTA ………LOOKS , MILEAGERIDE COMFORT AT REAR SEAT PATHETIC

            Ford ecosport best in it's segment

            Ford ecosport is the perfect car from good music system to sturdy built it has got it all. Overall the car has a comfortable drive although the gear is a bit hard but the build qualityand the well finished interiors make up for it.

            You may also like
            Starting at Rs. 8,50,000

            WR-V comparison with similar cars

            EcoSport comparison with similar cars

            Vitara Brezza [2020-2022] comparison with similar cars

            WR-V [2017-2020] vs Vitara Brezza [2016-2020] vs EcoSport [2015-2017] Comparison FAQs

            Q: Which car is cheaper between Honda WR-V [2017-2020], Maruti Suzuki Vitara Brezza [2016-2020] and Ford EcoSport [2015-2017]?
            Honda WR-V [2017-2020] price is Rs. 10.46 Lakh, Maruti Suzuki Vitara Brezza [2016-2020] price is Rs. 10.02 Lakh and Ford EcoSport [2015-2017] price is Rs. 10.40 Lakh. Hence Maruti Suzuki Vitara Brezza [2016-2020] is the cheapest amongst these cars.

            Q: Which car between WR-V [2017-2020], Vitara Brezza [2016-2020] and EcoSport [2015-2017] is better in terms of fuel economy?
            For the VX MT Diesel variant, mileage of WR-V [2017-2020] is 25.5kmpl, for the ZDi Plus variant, mileage of Vitara Brezza [2016-2020] is 24.29kmpl and for the Titanium+ 1.5L TDCi variant, mileage of EcoSport [2015-2017] is 22.27kmpl. Thus making WR-V [2017-2020] the most fuel efficient as compared to Vitara Brezza [2016-2020] and EcoSport [2015-2017]

            Q: How is the performance of WR-V [2017-2020] compared to Vitara Brezza [2016-2020] and EcoSport [2015-2017]?
            For the VX MT Diesel variant, 1498 cc Diesel engine of WR-V [2017-2020] produces 99 bhp @ 3600 rpm of power and 200 Nm @ 1750 rpm of torque. For the ZDi Plus variant, 1248 cc Diesel engine of Vitara Brezza [2016-2020] produces 89 bhp @ 4000 rpm of power and 200 Nm @ 1750 rpm of torque. For the Titanium+ 1.5L TDCi variant, 1498 cc Diesel engine of EcoSport [2015-2017] produces 99 bhp @ 3750 rpm of power and 205 Nm @ 1750 rpm of torque.
            Disclaimer: For the above Comparison of Compare WR-V [2017-2020], Vitara Brezza [2016-2020] and EcoSport [2015-2017], CarWale has taken utmost care in gathering precise and accurate information about price, specs, features, colours etc, however, CarWale cannot be held liable for any direct or indirect damage/loss. For Compare WR-V [2017-2020], Vitara Brezza [2016-2020] and EcoSport [2015-2017] comparison, we have considered most popular variant on CarWale as default, however, any variant of these cars can be compared.
            • Home
            • Compare Cars
            • Honda WR-V [2017-2020] vs Maruti Suzuki Vitara Brezza [2016-2020] vs Ford EcoSport [2015-2017]