CarWale
Doodle Image-1Doodle Image-2Doodle Image-3Doodle Image-4
    AD

    Skoda Kylaq vs Maruti Suzuki S-Cross [2014-2017]

    CarWale brings you comparison of Skoda Kylaq and Maruti Suzuki S-Cross [2014-2017]. The Skoda Kylaq price is Rs. 7.89 Lakh and Maruti Suzuki S-Cross [2014-2017] price is Rs. 8.19 Lakh. The Skoda Kylaq is available in 999 cc engine with 1 fuel type options: Petrol and Maruti Suzuki S-Cross [2014-2017] is available in 1248 cc engine with 1 fuel type options: Diesel. S-Cross [2014-2017] provides the mileage of 23.65 kmpl.

    Kylaq vs S-Cross [2014-2017] Comparison Overview

    Key HighlightsKylaq S-Cross [2014-2017]
    PriceRs. 7.89 LakhRs. 8.19 Lakh
    Engine Capacity999 cc1248 cc
    Power114 bhp89 bhp
    TransmissionManualManual
    Fuel TypePetrolDiesel
    Skoda Kylaq
    Rs. 7.89 Lakh
    Avg. Ex-Showroom price
    VS
    Maruti Suzuki S-Cross [2014-2017]
    Rs. 8.19 Lakh
    Last Recorded Price
    VS
    Select Car
    Select Car
    VS
    VS
    Select Car
    Select Car
    • SPECIFICATIONS
    • FEATURES
    • BROCHURE
    • COLOURS
    • USER REVIEWS
        • SPECIFICATIONS
        • FEATURES
        • BROCHURE
        • COLOURS
        • USER REVIEWS

            Specifications and Finance

            Finance
            Loading...
            Loading...
            Loading...
            Loading...
            • Engine & Transmission
            • Dimensions & Weight
            • Capacity
            • Suspensions, Brakes, Steering & Tyres

            Features

            • Safety
            • Braking & Traction
            • Locks & Security
            • Comfort & Convenience
            • Mobile App Features
            • Seats & Upholstery
            • Storage
            • Doors, Windows, Mirrors & Wipers
            • Exterior
            • Lighting
            • Instrumentation
            • Entertainment, Information & Communication
            • Manufacturer Warranty

            Colours

            Carbon Steel
            Urban Blue
            Lava Blue
            Granite Grey
            Tornado Red
            Caffeine Brown
            Olive Gold
            Premium Silky Silver
            Brilliant Silver
            Pearl Arctic White
            Candy White

            User Reviews

            Overall Rating

            4.8/5

            75 Ratings

            3.6/5

            5 Ratings

            Rating Parameters

            4.7Exterior

            3.6Exterior

            4.8Comfort

            4.6Comfort

            4.6Performance

            3.6Performance

            4.4Fuel Economy

            3.4Fuel Economy

            4.8Value for Money

            3.8Value for Money

            Most Helpful Review

            Mini kushaq

            Nice only. It has good power with its 1 lts TSI engine. And great boot space. Decent ground clearance. LED DRL. But the rear seats are good for 2 adults. Good for those who love to drive.

            POOR QUALITY AND SERVICES 4 S-CROSS BY NEXA COCHIN

            <p>Friends, I must say this vehicle is such a pathetic quality in my short experience, which is as short as 5-6days doing just 279kms. I had a narrow escape from a head on collision with a tanker truck while overtaking a vehicle. All of us have a calculation while overtaking. This vehicle suddenly stopped releasing its engine power during the overtake and I was stuck half way through and almost got hit.</p> <p>I found the check engine on and opened the engine room to have a look. I found the turbo hose broken. Next step was to reach the people who sold me this vehicle. None of them were available probably being a weekend sunday. Next step was to look for roadside assistance and I could not find any such numbers stuck to the vehicle. I tried most of the numbers in the service network booklet and could not reach anyone for help. Finally I found the toll free number at the last page of the booklet which can be reached only from a BSNL line. WOW. what a support. Upon getting through I said I am in an emergency situation and needs immediate support. Since I could not hear the voice properly, I conveyed my mobile number and waited for a call return as promised by the agent. I waited for more than 15mins and decided to take another car and continue my journey.</p> <p>After I reached back, Nexa team visited my home to inspect the damage and suggested replacing the damaged hose, without giving any valid reason for the damage caused. I was told verbally by one of the senior that it may be a rodent attack;). The vehicle didn't have a PDI OK sticker on it and I questioned the matter as I had already written the warranty clause in the Owner's manual.</p> <p>7th clause - Owner's Warranty Responsibilities:</p> <p>It is responsibility of each owner to:</p> <p>Make certain that the PDI card was completed at the time of delivery of the vehicle;</p> <p>The best part is this manual is delivered to an owner while delivering the vehicle.:) so I need not say how far we can ensure the Owner's warranty responsibilities. Please read the booklet if you get a chance.</p> <p>While I pointed all these matters, they never had any convincing answers for most of my concerns. They simply wanted to take the vehicle away and replace the damaged part and return the car to me.</p> <p>As the damage has happened to a turbo hose. The damage will have effect on other parts of the engine with dirt entering the air channel &amp; also damaging the sensors in that area with impact damage and abrasion to the engine, which will start to reduce the efficiency of the turbo. Why would I be suffering such a damage at the 279th kilometer of a new vehicle. I demanded a decent compensation as they refused to accept the return of the damaged car or give me a new car.</p> <p>I have informed them that I will be left with no option other than moving legal to protect my interests, to which they are least bothered.</p> <p>Still it is better for them not to accept the following facts and continue selling the car as much as possible by reducing price as frequently as possible. Please notice the price drop from launch time and do not blindly trust the quality of Nexa series from maruti, as I found the rubber, electrical and other non metal molded parts are all substandard, which will have serious damages causing to the engine and other systems sooner. A search for S Cross reviews revealed the severe sensor issues which is making the vehicle malfunction in many ways. I suspect this turbo hose damage could be due to the faulty sensors.</p> <p>My sincere advice to S Cross Buyers is to open the engine room and check on the above mentioned parts and its quality. You will find the S Cross Bonnet cover so low in weight compare to a Ford Eco Sport. Check the body toughness and compare with other cars in the same class such as duster, eco sport, Etios cross etc. Front Air Bags are statutory and mandatory according to the RTA in india. Dealers project it as a feature offered from their big heart.</p> <p>I must say. Just don't buy this car for its good reasons considering the hidden cheating elements in it and the attitude of the company.</p> <p>I regret changing my decision not to go for Creta, who offered INR. 100000 more for my old car. I opted for S Cross because they were willing to deliver immediate, which has bombed my expectations.</p> <p>Friends, A Big NO NO NO to S Cross &amp; Nexa Cochin by Popular.</p>NOTHING FOR NOWPOOR QUALITY

            You may also like
            Starting at Rs. 5,00,000
            Starting at Rs. 2,70,000

            Kylaq comparison with similar cars

            S-Cross [2014-2017] comparison with similar cars

            Kylaq vs S-Cross [2014-2017] Comparison FAQs

            Q: Which car is cheaper between Skoda Kylaq and Maruti Suzuki S-Cross [2014-2017]?
            Skoda Kylaq price is Rs. 7.89 Lakh and Maruti Suzuki S-Cross [2014-2017] price is Rs. 8.19 Lakh. Hence Skoda Kylaq is the cheapest amongst these cars.

            Q: How is the performance of Kylaq compared to S-Cross [2014-2017]?
            For the Classic variant, 999 cc Petrol engine of Kylaq produces 114 bhp of power and 178 Nm @ 1750 rpm of torque. For the Sigma 1.3 variant, 1248 cc Diesel engine of S-Cross [2014-2017] produces 89 bhp @ 4000 rpm of power and 200 Nm @ 1750 rpm of torque.
            Disclaimer: For the above Comparison of Compare Kylaq and S-Cross [2014-2017], CarWale has taken utmost care in gathering precise and accurate information about price, specs, features, colours etc, however, CarWale cannot be held liable for any direct or indirect damage/loss. For Compare Kylaq and S-Cross [2014-2017] comparison, we have considered most popular variant on CarWale as default, however, any variant of these cars can be compared.