MG Astor vs Skoda Yeti [2010-2014]

16 Ratings

2 Ratings

Good featured car

All are good Pros: driving is very smooth, boot space, handling. Sprint variant is value for Money, getting all options which are needed. Cons: Mileage in the city, back seat thigh support

Just driven about 500 kms

<p><strong>Exterior</strong> Smart looking SUV, not all will have one. Very different from its competitors.</p> <p><strong>Interior (Features, Space &amp; Comfort)</strong> Good for 5 adults, leg room is also decent. Boot space could have been better.</p> <p><strong>Engine Performance, Fuel Economy and Gearbox</strong> Very torquey engine, best quality drive at high rpms. Around 12 in city &amp; 14 on the highway. Very solid build quality, feels like a tank from inside. Gearbox is smooth enough comapred to other SUVs.</p> <p><strong>Ride Quality &amp; Handling</strong> Ride quality is excellent on highways but not great in city traffic. Car halts at low RPM &amp; required continous shifting of gears in traffic conditions. Music quality is superb, inside plastic quality is value for money, much much better than any other SUV's in the market. Very bulky car, solid build quality. Suspension is at its best when you are at high speeds</p> <p><strong>Final Words</strong> Good small SUV, very good for off roading.</p> <p><strong>Areas of improvement</strong> Clutch, boot space.</p>Peppy engine, torque quality, good road grip, high way drivingEngine stalls at low RPM, clutch gives a delicate feeling