MG Astor vs Skoda Laura

15 Ratings

1 Rating

Good featured car

All are good Pros: driving is very smooth, boot space, handling. Sprint variant is value for Money, getting all options which are needed. Cons: Mileage in the city, back seat thigh support

Own a laura petrol 1.8 tsi for 3 months now

<p>&nbsp;</p> <p><strong>Exterior&nbsp; </strong>The new laura looks better than its predecessors. From thefront looks like the superb. There should be more colours available in the petrol cersion.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><strong>Interior (Features, Space &amp; Comfort) </strong>can seat 4 comfortably. Good quality finishes. However, beige carpets are not suitable to our driving conditions. Comfortable at the front and back. The petrol should have more choices in colour and upholstery colour.<strong><br /></strong></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><strong>Engine Performance, Fuel Economy and Gearbox </strong>Engine is brilliant. Many times you cannot make out if its in or not. Gear box -- like a knife through butter. fuel economy 10 in city and 11.5 on highway.<strong><br /></strong></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><strong>Ride Quality &amp; Handling </strong>Havedriven to Goa and mumbai several times. drives very well. No problem in handling so far.<strong><br /></strong></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><strong>Final Words </strong>For the price of 14.4 lacs on road. worth it. drives better than the vw jetta which was my other choice.<strong><br /></strong></p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><strong>Areas of improvement</strong> Need to work on the negative reviews of the company online and offline. dealers need to be better informed. i dealt with europa auto in pune. Still not recd my orignal rto registration and insurance policy after 3 months. more colours in petrol version.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p>looks, style, finishing, boot space, pick upautomatic version not available, other interior frills, logos need tobefixed properly