CarWale
Doodle Image-1Doodle Image-2Doodle Image-3
    AD

    Maruti Suzuki Wagon R vs Chevrolet Beat [2009-2011]

    CarWale brings you comparison of Maruti Suzuki Wagon R and Chevrolet Beat [2009-2011]. The Maruti Suzuki Wagon R price is Rs. 5.54 Lakh and Chevrolet Beat [2009-2011] price is Rs. 4.01 Lakh. The Maruti Suzuki Wagon R is available in 998 cc engine with 2 fuel type options: Petrol and CNG and Chevrolet Beat [2009-2011] is available in 1199 cc engine with 1 fuel type options: Petrol. Wagon R provides the mileage of 24.35 kmpl and Beat [2009-2011] provides the mileage of 18.6 kmpl.

    Wagon R vs Beat [2009-2011] Comparison Overview

    Key HighlightsWagon R Beat [2009-2011]
    PriceRs. 5.54 LakhRs. 4.01 Lakh
    Engine Capacity998 cc1199 cc
    Power66 bhp79 bhp
    TransmissionManualManual
    Fuel TypePetrolPetrol
    Maruti Suzuki Wagon R
    Rs. 5.54 Lakh
    Avg. Ex-Showroom price
    VS
    Chevrolet Beat [2009-2011]
    Rs. 4.01 Lakh
    Last Recorded Price
    VS
    Select Car
    Select Car
    VS
    VS
    Select Car
    Select Car
    • SPECIFICATIONS
    • FEATURES
    • BROCHURE
    • COLOURS
    • USER REVIEWS
        • SPECIFICATIONS
        • FEATURES
        • BROCHURE
        • COLOURS
        • USER REVIEWS

            Specifications and Finance

            Finance
            Loading...
            Loading...
            Loading...
            Loading...
            • Engine & Transmission
            • Dimensions & Weight
            • Capacity
            • Suspensions, Brakes, Steering & Tyres

            Features

            • Safety
            • Braking & Traction
            • Locks & Security
            • Comfort & Convenience
            • Seats & Upholstery
            • Storage
            • Doors, Windows, Mirrors & Wipers
            • Exterior
            • Lighting
            • Instrumentation
            • Entertainment, Information & Communication
            • Manufacturer Warranty

            Brochure

            Colours

            Magma Grey
            Moroccan Blue
            Silky Silver
            Caviar Black
            Superior White
            Sandrif Grey
            Misty Lake
            Summit White
            Super Red
            Cocktail Green
            Switch Blade Silver
            Linen Beige

            User Reviews

            Overall Rating

            4.5/5

            22 Ratings

            4.0/5

            5 Ratings

            Rating Parameters

            3.8Exterior

            4.6Exterior

            4.2Comfort

            4.2Comfort

            4.2Performance

            4.4Performance

            4.6Fuel Economy

            4.2Fuel Economy

            4.6Value for Money

            4.6Value for Money

            Most Helpful Review

            Best performance and best quality

            1. Buying experience was good. It was easily available and packed. 2.I like driving this car. I am riding this car even in market. 3. Look is different from others cars but I like it and performance is best. 4.I think and I personally feeling service and maintenance is very low compared to other cars. 5. Pros is everything. Cons is look only.

            Chevrolet Beat - Value for Money Pick

            <p style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt;">Writing this review 45 days post- delivery and after driving for 1000 kms. I have the Chevrolet Beat base model with power steering and A/C (both are basic &ndash; no models without those features)</p> <p style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt;"><strong>Background</strong></p> <p style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt;">My wife and I bought the Beat after a lot of evaluation of cars in the hatchback and entry level sedans.</p> <p style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt;"><strong>The criteria:</strong> a fuel efficient car that can comfortably seat 5</p> <p style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt;"><strong>The Drive</strong></p> <p style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt;">I usually drive in the city to commute to office and back in Mumbai - daily 45 kms, 30 kms freeway and the rest in traffic.&nbsp; I drive with a combination of air conditioning off and on depending on the time of the day. &nbsp;I don&rsquo;t race beyond 80 kmph and prefer to drive at 65 even on the highways.</p> <p style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt;">I got an average of 12.6 kmpl after initial check up and first servicing. I am expecting this to improve over time.</p> <p>I don&rsquo;t want to comment on the looks and upholstery of the car as that is purely a matter of personal choice. To summarize the positives and negatives:</p> <p style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt;"><strong>Positives:</strong></p> <p style="text-indent: -0.25in; margin: 0in 0in 0pt 0.5in; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1;">&middot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Value for money : 1200 cc car with a good average</p> <p style="text-indent: -0.25in; margin: 0in 0in 0pt 0.5in; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1;">&middot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Comfortable ride</p> <p style="text-indent: -0.25in; margin: 0in 0in 0pt 0.5in; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1;">&middot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Optimal spacing inside the cabin &ndash; leg room, head room is good</p> <p style="text-indent: -0.25in; margin: 0in 0in 0pt 0.5in; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1;">&middot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Decent fuel economy</p> <p style="text-indent: -0.25in; margin: 0in 0in 10pt 0.5in; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1;">&middot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 3 year warranty program</p> <p style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt;"><strong>Negatives:</strong></p> <p style="text-indent: -0.25in; margin: 0in 0in 0pt 0.5in; mso-list: l1 level1 lfo2;">&middot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; A/C pulls down the performance noticeably</p> <p style="text-indent: -0.25in; margin: 0in 0in 0pt 0.5in; mso-list: l1 level1 lfo2;">&middot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Acceleration is a bit tight (this can be worked upon though I think)</p> <p style="text-indent: -0.25in; margin: 0in 0in 10pt 0.5in; mso-list: l1 level1 lfo2;">&middot;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Pick-up suffers in lower gears.</p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt;">Overall Verdict: &nbsp;Satisfied. More updates when I get to 5000 kms.</p>Good fuel economy, SpacePick-up in lower gears

            You may also like
            Starting at Rs. 35,000
            Starting at Rs. 68,000

            More Expert Reviews on Wagon R and Beat [2009-2011]

            Wagon R comparison with similar cars

            Beat [2009-2011] comparison with similar cars

            Wagon R vs Beat [2009-2011] Comparison FAQs

            Q: Which car is cheaper between Maruti Suzuki Wagon R and Chevrolet Beat [2009-2011]?
            Maruti Suzuki Wagon R price is Rs. 5.54 Lakh and Chevrolet Beat [2009-2011] price is Rs. 4.01 Lakh. Hence Chevrolet Beat [2009-2011] is the cheapest amongst these cars.

            Q: Which car between Wagon R and Beat [2009-2011] is better in terms of fuel economy?
            For the LXI 1.0 variant, mileage of Wagon R is 24.35kmpl and for the PS Petrol variant, mileage of Beat [2009-2011] is 18.6kmpl. Thus making Wagon R the most fuel efficient as compared to Beat [2009-2011]

            Q: How is the performance of Wagon R compared to Beat [2009-2011]?
            For the LXI 1.0 variant, 998 cc Petrol engine of Wagon R produces 66 bhp @ 5500 rpm of power and 89 Nm @ 3500 rpm of torque. For the PS Petrol variant, 1199 cc Petrol engine of Beat [2009-2011] produces 79 bhp @ 6200 rpm of power and 108 Nm @ 4400 rpm of torque.
            Disclaimer: For the above Comparison of Compare Wagon R and Beat [2009-2011], CarWale has taken utmost care in gathering precise and accurate information about price, specs, features, colours etc, however, CarWale cannot be held liable for any direct or indirect damage/loss. For Compare Wagon R and Beat [2009-2011] comparison, we have considered most popular variant on CarWale as default, however, any variant of these cars can be compared.