CarWale
    AD

    Maruti Suzuki S-Presso vs Fiat Punto [2011-2014]

    CarWale brings you comparison of Maruti Suzuki S-Presso and Fiat Punto [2011-2014]. The Maruti Suzuki S-Presso price is Rs. 4.75 Lakh and Fiat Punto [2011-2014] price is Rs. 5.38 Lakh. The Maruti Suzuki S-Presso is available in 998 cc engine with 2 fuel type options: Petrol and CNG and Fiat Punto [2011-2014] is available in 1172 cc engine with 1 fuel type options: Petrol. S-Presso provides the mileage of 24.12 kmpl and Punto [2011-2014] provides the mileage of 15.2 kmpl.

    S-Presso vs Punto [2011-2014] Comparison Overview

    Key HighlightsS-Presso Punto [2011-2014]
    PriceRs. 4.75 LakhRs. 5.38 Lakh
    Engine Capacity998 cc1172 cc
    Power66 bhp67 bhp
    TransmissionManualManual
    Fuel TypePetrolPetrol
    Maruti Suzuki S-Presso
    Rs. 4.75 Lakh
    On-Road Price, Delhi
    VS
    Fiat Punto [2011-2014]
    Rs. 5.38 Lakh
    Last Recorded Price
    VS
    Select Car
    Select Car
    VS
    VS
    Select Car
    Select Car
    • SPECIFICATIONS
    • FEATURES
    • BROCHURE
    • COLOURS
    • USER REVIEWS
        • SPECIFICATIONS
        • FEATURES
        • BROCHURE
        • COLOURS
        • USER REVIEWS

            Specifications and Finance

            Finance
            Loading...
            Loading...
            Get Loan Offers
            Loading...
            Loading...
            • Engine & Transmission
            • Dimensions & Weight
            • Capacity
            • Suspensions, Brakes, Steering & Tyres

            Features

            • Safety
            • Braking & Traction
            • Locks & Security
            • Comfort & Convenience
            • Seats & Upholstery
            • Storage
            • Doors, Windows, Mirrors & Wipers
            • Exterior
            • Lighting
            • Instrumentation
            • Entertainment, Information & Communication
            • Manufacturer Warranty

            Brochure

            Colours

            Pearl Starry Blue
            Hip hop black
            Metallic Granite Grey
            Ocean BLue
            Metallic Silky Silver
            Tuscan Wine
            Solid Fire Red
            Fox trote Azure
            Solid Sizzle Orange
            Exotica red
            Solid White
            Minimal Grey

            User Reviews

            Overall Rating

            3.0/5

            1 Rating

            3.3/5

            4 Ratings

            Rating Parameters

            3.0Exterior

            3.3Exterior

            3.0Comfort

            3.7Comfort

            3.0Performance

            3.3Performance

            3.0Fuel Economy

            3.0Fuel Economy

            3.0Value for Money

            3.7Value for Money

            Most Helpful Review

            A good car

            A good car is a good car I like it. It is a budget car. If you have less money then you go for this car person car. Also available. White and black color is good. It is better than Alto

            fFIAT PUNTO - A FLOP NON PERFORMING CAR

            <p><strong>Exterior</strong></p> <p>&nbsp;shape&nbsp; &amp; style was appealing, but the biggest issue is&nbsp; near to zero ground clearence</p> <p><strong>Interior (Features, Space &amp; Comfort)</strong></p> <p>&nbsp;bad interiors,poor ac effectiveness,space is ok.</p> <p><strong>Engine Performance, Fuel Economy and Gearbox</strong></p> <p>&nbsp;worst and weekest engine i have noticed in my life. pickup on second gear is near to zero as you can climb on slope , mountains , car will come reverse , not fit for indian conditions.</p> <p>fuel economy is actually less than /around 9 while they claim 15.</p> <p>gear box&nbsp; bad not effective</p> <p><strong>Ride Quality &amp; Handling</strong></p> <p>&nbsp;ground clearence very less hence you are everytime prone to damage and accident</p> <p><strong>Final Words</strong></p> <p>&nbsp;never go for a fiat brand car ,this is my learning by buying a fiat punto.</p> <p><strong>Areas of improvement</strong>&nbsp;&nbsp;</p> <p>pickup on second gear, fuel efficiency , ground clearence to be improved other wise i would not recomment any body to buy this car ,as he will only weep and run after their dealers .</p> <p>&nbsp;</p>THE SHAPE ,THE STYLEvery very poor pickup on second gear ,poor average is less than 9 km/l,ac is very poor ,bad interior

            You may also like
            Starting at Rs. 3,44,273
            Starting at Rs. 2,50,000

            More Expert Reviews on S-Presso and Punto [2011-2014]

            S-Presso comparison with similar cars

            Punto [2011-2014] comparison with similar cars

            S-Presso vs Punto [2011-2014] Comparison FAQs

            Q: Which car is cheaper between Maruti Suzuki S-Presso and Fiat Punto [2011-2014]?
            Maruti Suzuki S-Presso price is Rs. 4.75 Lakh and Fiat Punto [2011-2014] price is Rs. 5.38 Lakh. Hence Maruti Suzuki S-Presso is the cheapest amongst these cars.

            Q: Which car between S-Presso and Punto [2011-2014] is better in terms of fuel economy?
            For the Std (O) variant, mileage of S-Presso is 24.12kmpl and for the Active 1.2 variant, mileage of Punto [2011-2014] is 15.2kmpl. Thus making S-Presso the most fuel efficient as compared to Punto [2011-2014]

            Q: How is the performance of S-Presso compared to Punto [2011-2014]?
            For the Std (O) variant, 998 cc Petrol engine of S-Presso produces 66 bhp @ 5500 rpm of power and 89 Nm @ 3500 rpm of torque. For the Active 1.2 variant, 1172 cc Petrol engine of Punto [2011-2014] produces 67 bhp @ 6000 rpm of power and 96 Nm @ 2500 rpm of torque.
            Disclaimer: For the above Comparison of Compare S-Presso and Punto [2011-2014], CarWale has taken utmost care in gathering precise and accurate information about price, specs, features, colours etc, however, CarWale cannot be held liable for any direct or indirect damage/loss. For Compare S-Presso and Punto [2011-2014] comparison, we have considered most popular variant on CarWale as default, however, any variant of these cars can be compared.