CarWale
Doodle Image-1Doodle Image-2Doodle Image-3Doodle Image-4
    AD

    Maruti Suzuki S-Presso vs Fiat Palio Stile [2007-2011]

    CarWale brings you comparison of Maruti Suzuki S-Presso and Fiat Palio Stile [2007-2011]. The Maruti Suzuki S-Presso price is Rs. 4.26 Lakh and Fiat Palio Stile [2007-2011] price is Rs. 3.48 Lakh. The Maruti Suzuki S-Presso is available in 998 cc engine with 2 fuel type options: Petrol and CNG and Fiat Palio Stile [2007-2011] is available in 1108 cc engine with 1 fuel type options: Petrol. S-Presso provides the mileage of 24.12 kmpl and Palio Stile [2007-2011] provides the mileage of 12.4 kmpl.

    S-Presso vs Palio Stile [2007-2011] Comparison Overview

    Key HighlightsS-Presso Palio Stile [2007-2011]
    PriceRs. 4.26 LakhRs. 3.48 Lakh
    Engine Capacity998 cc1108 cc
    Power66 bhp-
    TransmissionManualManual
    Fuel TypePetrolPetrol
    Maruti Suzuki S-Presso
    Rs. 4.26 Lakh
    Avg. Ex-Showroom price
    VS
    Fiat Palio Stile [2007-2011]
    Rs. 3.48 Lakh
    Last Recorded Price
    VS
    Select Car
    Select Car
    VS
    VS
    Select Car
    Select Car
    • SPECIFICATIONS
    • FEATURES
    • BROCHURE
    • COLOURS
    • USER REVIEWS
        • SPECIFICATIONS
        • FEATURES
        • BROCHURE
        • COLOURS
        • USER REVIEWS

            Specifications and Finance

            Finance
            Loading...
            Loading...
            Loading...
            Loading...
            • Engine & Transmission
            • Dimensions & Weight
            • Capacity
            • Suspensions, Brakes, Steering & Tyres

            Features

            • Safety
            • Braking & Traction
            • Locks & Security
            • Comfort & Convenience
            • Seats & Upholstery
            • Storage
            • Doors, Windows, Mirrors & Wipers
            • Exterior
            • Lighting
            • Instrumentation
            • Entertainment, Information & Communication
            • Manufacturer Warranty

            Brochure

            Colours

            Pearl Starry Blue
            Carbon Black
            Metallic Granite Grey
            Ozone Blue
            Metallic Silky Silver
            Magnesium Grey
            Solid Fire Red
            Furnace Red
            Solid Sizzle Orange
            Mint White
            Solid White

            User Reviews

            Overall Rating

            3.0/5

            1 Rating

            3.0/5

            1 Rating

            Rating Parameters

            3.0Exterior

            5.0Exterior

            3.0Comfort

            5.0Comfort

            3.0Performance

            3.0Performance

            3.0Fuel Economy

            3.0Fuel Economy

            3.0Value for Money

            4.0Value for Money

            Most Helpful Review

            A good car

            A good car is a good car I like it. It is a budget car. If you have less money then you go for this car person car. Also available. White and black color is good. It is better than Alto

            Good balance of sturdiness, Fuel economy, Comfortable, and a true 5seater hatch back

            <P>Hi All,</P> <P>I&nbsp;Purchased a Fiat Palio 1.1SL Black from Concorde. Its&nbsp;now correct time to&nbsp;talk on the ownership experience, but would like to put down the selection criteria.</P> <P>Wagon R is a thin metal sheet ok for urban (cross to cross and local area commuting) and is a good replacement for a 3 Wheel autorickshaw. Only thing is it sells at 3.32L for LX despite its huge sales numbers (higher sales gives scope for manufacturer to reduce the margin on individual cars and offer it at lesser price, which maruti is not doing). Xing is a good car except for the backseat comfort and narrow width. Koreans and Japanese people have comfort cause of thier own average people sizes. but still SUMO wrestlers cannot fit in either of these. they still have to go for a SUV. Fuel effy of both these are good, considering, but beware they have 5 seatbelts and can seat 4 people.</P> <P>Fiat Palio- the front axle width is wider than the back axle (very imprnt for cornering at high speeds). most SUV have similar axle width ratios.</P> <P>the body is of same width all along and is clearly wider by 10cms then xing and 15cms (half feet) than Wagon R. both xing and WR have equal axle widths and are squarish treads.</P> <P>Tubeless tyres are in Palio. 165/80 rubber 13inch. </P> <P>My palio, a Corporate lease car, returned roughly15.8 kmpl in its 3000KMS range with 1300kms city/bad road/hilly terrain drive. this is&nbsp;with in most cases, 5 people on board with GVW-990KGS+360KGS.</P> <P>Pick up is clearly slow but observe the 1/4 mile distance is covered in 5seconds&nbsp;delay to that of Xing and Wagon R. Even if for the entire life,&nbsp;we cummulate the 5seconds, we may loose 5 yrs time for 60yrs of driving. But tell me who drives for 60yrs driving time and if so, what would 5yrs matter for him then. </P> <P>If the 3cars are put on race from Bangalore to Delhi (with a perfect straight highway exclusively for the 3), and all the three are on full throttle (that is 150kmph xing, 145kmph wagonR and 131kmph Palio Stile), only then Stile would take a full 3hrs late arrival at Delhi after 15hrs 2200kms continous drive. Thats the maximum difference.&nbsp;We (the palio users never pitch palio for doing this job).&nbsp;We know that our OEM has a much better answer in&nbsp;Ferrari's to do this job. and</P> <P>Suzuki is known to be a very good BIKE manufacturer.</P> <P>But lets remember, the tolerance on Indian roads are 80-100kmph and also, I do remember we frequently have to decelerate and accelerate where the Xing's and WagonR's may win.</P> <P>Most important to remember also is, we do not have a straight track all along. for curves, a Differential width pair of axles (particularly the wide front track) is important (and no tall boy design&nbsp;please). Palio manages to maintain a relatively&nbsp;although may be 10kmph&nbsp;higher speed&nbsp;while cornering.</P> <P>Another important thing is the 80-0kmph braking distance required, which is the lowest for Palio and the other 2 have real problems.</P> <P>A typical indian car customer is lured by the BHP (they also dont see at which RPM is the BHP), and the KMPL (they never bother how much is the seating capacity) althought there can be 5 seat belts on every car. well, if we are actually thinking to have a good FE for 1 person, then better drive a Bajaj Platina? for FE, or if we think we need a reasonable so called societal commute (?) then better those buy a 3 BOX Sedan like SX4?.</P> <P>Among Getz, UVA and Fiat Palio (the comparable 3 cars), The choice is clearly Palio Stile 1.1SL, for some trade off for sure in the pick-up. The power is really pathetically low and is best sutied for sedate driving people. Fiat is just 5cms lesser in width compared to Getz and UVA. Again, please do not take those pick up and BHP figures.</P> <P>The xing's and Wagon R's are better compared with SPARK (all the 3 are 4seaters 1ltr engines).</P>Driveability, steerability at high speeds, comfortable back seatslightly sluggish

            You may also like
            Starting at Rs. 2,00,000
            Starting at Rs. 30,000

            S-Presso comparison with similar cars

            Palio Stile [2007-2011] comparison with similar cars

            S-Presso vs Palio Stile [2007-2011] Comparison FAQs

            Q: Which car is cheaper between Maruti Suzuki S-Presso and Fiat Palio Stile [2007-2011]?
            Maruti Suzuki S-Presso price is Rs. 4.26 Lakh and Fiat Palio Stile [2007-2011] price is Rs. 3.48 Lakh. Hence Fiat Palio Stile [2007-2011] is the cheapest amongst these cars.

            Q: Which car between S-Presso and Palio Stile [2007-2011] is better in terms of fuel economy?
            For the Std (O) variant, mileage of S-Presso is 24.12kmpl and for the SL 1.1 variant, mileage of Palio Stile [2007-2011] is 12.4kmpl. Thus making S-Presso the most fuel efficient as compared to Palio Stile [2007-2011]

            Q: How is the performance of S-Presso compared to Palio Stile [2007-2011]?
            For the Std (O) variant, 998 cc Petrol engine of S-Presso produces 66 bhp @ 5500 rpm of power and 89 Nm @ 3500 rpm of torque. For the SL 1.1 variant, 1108 cc Petrol engine of Palio Stile [2007-2011] produces 57@5250 of power and 92@2750 of torque.
            Disclaimer: For the above Comparison of Compare S-Presso and Palio Stile [2007-2011], CarWale has taken utmost care in gathering precise and accurate information about price, specs, features, colours etc, however, CarWale cannot be held liable for any direct or indirect damage/loss. For Compare S-Presso and Palio Stile [2007-2011] comparison, we have considered most popular variant on CarWale as default, however, any variant of these cars can be compared.