Maruti Suzuki Grand Vitara vs Skoda Yeti [2010-2014]

59 Ratings

2 Ratings

Best buy

Best car of this segment. Lovely look from out side as well as nice interiors. Value for money car. I drove my Grand Vitara Sigma for 100 km on highway with 27.1 Km/l. I was completely surprised to see the performance. My car's first service has been done with 'zero' expanse. Loved the service of Maruti Suzuki. One bad thing i faced that in Sigma variant the back camera fitting was not proper. Over-all best buy.

Just driven about 500 kms

<p><strong>Exterior</strong> Smart looking SUV, not all will have one. Very different from its competitors.</p> <p><strong>Interior (Features, Space &amp; Comfort)</strong> Good for 5 adults, leg room is also decent. Boot space could have been better.</p> <p><strong>Engine Performance, Fuel Economy and Gearbox</strong> Very torquey engine, best quality drive at high rpms. Around 12 in city &amp; 14 on the highway. Very solid build quality, feels like a tank from inside. Gearbox is smooth enough comapred to other SUVs.</p> <p><strong>Ride Quality &amp; Handling</strong> Ride quality is excellent on highways but not great in city traffic. Car halts at low RPM &amp; required continous shifting of gears in traffic conditions. Music quality is superb, inside plastic quality is value for money, much much better than any other SUV's in the market. Very bulky car, solid build quality. Suspension is at its best when you are at high speeds</p> <p><strong>Final Words</strong> Good small SUV, very good for off roading.</p> <p><strong>Areas of improvement</strong> Clutch, boot space.</p>Peppy engine, torque quality, good road grip, high way drivingEngine stalls at low RPM, clutch gives a delicate feeling