CarWale
Doodle Image-1Doodle Image-2Doodle Image-3Doodle Image-4
    AD

    Hyundai Grand i10 Nios vs Mahindra KUV100 [2016-2017]

    CarWale brings you comparison of Hyundai Grand i10 Nios and Mahindra KUV100 [2016-2017]. The Hyundai Grand i10 Nios price is Rs. 5.92 Lakh and Mahindra KUV100 [2016-2017] price is Rs. 4.70 Lakh. The Hyundai Grand i10 Nios is available in 1197 cc engine with 2 fuel type options: Petrol and CNG and Mahindra KUV100 [2016-2017] is available in 1198 cc engine with 2 fuel type options: Petrol and Diesel. KUV100 [2016-2017] provides the mileage of 18.14 kmpl.

    Grand i10 Nios vs KUV100 [2016-2017] Comparison Overview

    Key HighlightsGrand i10 Nios KUV100 [2016-2017]
    PriceRs. 5.92 LakhRs. 4.70 Lakh
    Engine Capacity1197 cc1198 cc
    Power82 bhp82 bhp
    TransmissionManualManual
    Fuel TypePetrolPetrol
    Hyundai Grand i10 Nios
    Rs. 5.92 Lakh
    Avg. Ex-Showroom price
    VS
    Mahindra KUV100 [2016-2017]
    Rs. 4.70 Lakh
    Last Recorded Price
    VS
    Select Car
    Select Car
    VS
    VS
    Select Car
    Select Car
    • SPECIFICATIONS
    • FEATURES
    • BROCHURE
    • COLOURS
    • USER REVIEWS
        • SPECIFICATIONS
        • FEATURES
        • BROCHURE
        • COLOURS
        • USER REVIEWS

            Specifications and Finance

            Finance
            Loading...
            Loading...
            Loading...
            Loading...
            • Engine & Transmission
            • Dimensions & Weight
            • Capacity
            • Suspensions, Brakes, Steering & Tyres

            Features

            • Safety
            • Braking & Traction
            • Locks & Security
            • Comfort & Convenience
            • Seats & Upholstery
            • Storage
            • Doors, Windows, Mirrors & Wipers
            • Exterior
            • Lighting
            • Instrumentation
            • Entertainment, Information & Communication
            • Manufacturer Warranty

            Brochure

            Colours

            Titan Grey
            Midnight Black
            Atlas White
            Designer Grey
            Fiery Orange
            Dazzling silver
            Pearl White
            Flamboyant Red

            User Reviews

            Overall Rating

            4.7/5

            9 Ratings

            3.7/5

            6 Ratings

            Rating Parameters

            4.2Exterior

            4.3Exterior

            4.3Comfort

            4.8Comfort

            4.3Performance

            3.5Performance

            3.8Fuel Economy

            2.0Fuel Economy

            4.7Value for Money

            3.3Value for Money

            Most Helpful Review

            Good car at this price

            Good car at this price and the mileage is good and affordable for a middle-class family, love this car very very nice and beautiful colors in collaboration with a beautiful design and a beautiful feeling of driving.

            Rohan Gupta

            <p><strong>Exterior</strong> Very good</p> <p><strong>Interior (Features, Space &amp; Comfort)</strong> Front leg space good but rear leg space is less when front seats are pushed backwards to the max&nbsp;</p> <p><strong>Engine Performance, Fuel Economy and Gearbox</strong> Am driving petrol version and do not find any engine problem but yes it is having poor fuel economy. Have drvien 8000 kms since september 2016 but am getting only 6-7 kms/litre.</p> <p><strong>Ride Quality &amp; Handling</strong> Fairly good</p> <p><strong>Final Words</strong>&nbsp;</p> <p><strong>Areas of improvement</strong></p> <p>1. Fuel economy needs to be improved and it should atleast give 15 kms/ litre.</p> <p>2. The clutch paddle is wrongly placed for a 5 feet 10 inch individual like me. My knees are in awkward position while pressing and removing my foot from clutch paddle as my knees touch middle dashboard.&nbsp;</p> <p>3. While taking right turns from driver side, the view is blocked due to vertical rails and rear mirror positions. The vertical rails of the car and the rear mirror block the view to such an extent that on blind right turns I had several chances of accidents especially with scooterists, pedestrians and cyclists as they just crop up from nowwhere within a fraction.&nbsp;</p> <p>4. Tank lid needs to be opened with coins and pins.</p>U r driving a SUV at the cost of Alto. Spacious, good AC comfort, Good overall controlpoor fuel economy, less boot space, less leg space for rear seats

            You may also like
            Starting at Rs. 3,00,000
            Starting at Rs. 35,000

            More Expert Reviews on Grand i10 Nios and KUV100 [2016-2017]

            Grand i10 Nios comparison with similar cars

            KUV100 [2016-2017] comparison with similar cars

            Grand i10 Nios vs KUV100 [2016-2017] Comparison FAQs

            Q: Which car is cheaper between Hyundai Grand i10 Nios and Mahindra KUV100 [2016-2017]?
            Hyundai Grand i10 Nios price is Rs. 5.92 Lakh and Mahindra KUV100 [2016-2017] price is Rs. 4.70 Lakh. Hence Mahindra KUV100 [2016-2017] is the cheapest amongst these cars.

            Q: How is the performance of Grand i10 Nios compared to KUV100 [2016-2017]?
            For the Era 1.2 Kappa variant, 1197 cc Petrol engine of Grand i10 Nios produces 82 bhp @ 6000 rpm of power and 114 Nm @ 4000 rpm of torque. For the K2 6 STR variant, 1198 cc Petrol engine of KUV100 [2016-2017] produces 82 bhp @ 5500 rpm of power and 115 Nm @ 3500 rpm of torque.
            Disclaimer: For the above Comparison of Compare Grand i10 Nios and KUV100 [2016-2017], CarWale has taken utmost care in gathering precise and accurate information about price, specs, features, colours etc, however, CarWale cannot be held liable for any direct or indirect damage/loss. For Compare Grand i10 Nios and KUV100 [2016-2017] comparison, we have considered most popular variant on CarWale as default, however, any variant of these cars can be compared.