Honda City vs Honda City [2014-2017]

22 Ratings

6 Ratings

Reliable predictable and consistent performance

I drove this car to Badrinath , Really enjoy the driving it's movability and engine is really very smooth Very good car If you drive between 60 to 70 km/h We get average 20++ AC is very effective

Sabiel Tirkey

<p><strong>Exterior</strong>&nbsp;Good looking.</p> <p><strong>Interior (Features, Space &amp; Comfort)</strong>&nbsp;Features , space and comfort good</p> <p><strong>Engine Performance, Fuel Economy and Gearbox</strong>&nbsp;Engine performance and and fuel economy is good. Gearbox is on the stiffer side, it is not so smooth.</p> <p><strong>Ride Quality &amp; Handling</strong>&nbsp;Good.</p> <p><strong>Final Words</strong>&nbsp;I have used it for 8000kM over 18 months period. After 4000kM squeaking sound has started coming from the dash board and door. It is getting worse day by day. I am getting the same feeling as my 10 year old zen regarding squeaky noise and vibration noise from dashboard and door due to poor quality of plastics and materials. The plastics used is very thin and already the interlocks&nbsp;in dashboard have started breaking and this is casuing vibration of the parts used in dashboard. I am afraid to think what will happen after 15000kM.&nbsp;The feel good factor has evaporated.</p> <p>The insulation used seems compromised, After long driving in mild summer the heat from engine enters the passenger cabin. It will get worse in summer.</p> <p>The quality of knobs used is not good, it is okay. The previous models had better quality.</p> <p>There is no nosie coming from the road into the cabin, unfortunately noises and squeaks are originating from the cabin itself.</p> <p><strong>Areas of improvement</strong>&nbsp;The plastics and other materials need drastic improvement. The insulation needs to be improved.</p>Engine is good.Cheap and flimsy plastics in dashboard and doors. Paint quality not good