CarWale
Doodle Image-1Doodle Image-2Doodle Image-3Doodle Image-4
    AD

    Honda City vs Ford EcoSport [2015-2017]

    CarWale brings you comparison of Honda City and Ford EcoSport [2015-2017]. The Honda City price is Rs. 11.86 Lakh and Ford EcoSport [2015-2017] price is Rs. 6.98 Lakh. The Honda City is available in 1498 cc engine with 1 fuel type options: Petrol and Ford EcoSport [2015-2017] is available in 1499 cc engine with 1 fuel type options: Petrol. City provides the mileage of 17.8 kmpl and EcoSport [2015-2017] provides the mileage of 15.8 kmpl.

    City vs EcoSport [2015-2017] Comparison Overview

    Key HighlightsCity EcoSport [2015-2017]
    PriceRs. 11.86 LakhRs. 6.98 Lakh
    Engine Capacity1498 cc1499 cc
    Power119 bhp110 bhp
    TransmissionManualManual
    Fuel TypePetrolPetrol
    Honda City
    Honda City
    SV Petrol MT
    Rs. 11.86 Lakh
    Avg. Ex-Showroom price
    VS
    Ford EcoSport [2015-2017]
    Ford EcoSport [2015-2017]
    Ambiente 1.5L Ti-VCT [2015-2016]
    Rs. 6.98 Lakh
    Last Recorded Price
    VS
    Select Car
    Select Car
    Honda City
    SV Petrol MT
    VS
    Ford EcoSport [2015-2017]
    Ambiente 1.5L Ti-VCT [2015-2016]
    VS
    Select Car
    Select Car
    • SPECIFICATIONS
    • FEATURES
    • BROCHURE
    • COLOURS
    • USER REVIEWS
        • SPECIFICATIONS
        • FEATURES
        • BROCHURE
        • COLOURS
        • USER REVIEWS

            Specifications and Finance

            Finance
            Loading...
            Loading...
            Loading...
            Loading...
            • Engine & Transmission
            • Dimensions & Weight
            • Capacity
            • Suspensions, Brakes, Steering & Tyres

            Features

            • Safety
            • Braking & Traction
            • Locks & Security
            • Comfort & Convenience
            • Mobile App Features
            • Seats & Upholstery
            • Storage
            • Doors, Windows, Mirrors & Wipers
            • Exterior
            • Lighting
            • Instrumentation
            • Entertainment, Information & Communication
            • Manufacturer Warranty

            Brochure

            Colours

            Golden Brown Metallic
            Kinetic Blue
            Meteoroid Grey Metallic
            Panther Black
            Lunar Silver Metallic
            Smoke Grey
            Platinum White Pearl
            Golden Bronze
            Mars Red
            Moondust Silver
            Chill Metallic
            Diamond White

            User Reviews

            Overall Rating

            4.5/5

            22 Ratings

            4.0/5

            4 Ratings

            Rating Parameters

            4.5Exterior

            4.0Exterior

            4.6Comfort

            4.3Comfort

            4.6Performance

            4.3Performance

            4.0Fuel Economy

            3.5Fuel Economy

            4.5Value for Money

            3.8Value for Money

            Most Helpful Review

            Reliable predictable and consistent performance

            I drove this car to Badrinath , Really enjoy the driving it's movability and engine is really very smooth Very good car If you drive between 60 to 70 km/h We get average 20++ AC is very effective

            No Mileage

            <p><strong>Exterior</strong> Looks good, perfectly designed no doubt about even though the back end looks a bit abrupt . Also the ground clearance very good.</p> <p><strong>Interior (Features, Space &amp; Comfort)</strong>&nbsp;Interior the plastic is of really poor quality but considering the price thats expected. Altough i think they should have kept power windows for the back windows too.</p> <p><strong>Engine Performance, Fuel Economy and Gearbox</strong>&nbsp;Engine is beautifully designed responses very well but the problem I faced was the car on this version that is 1.5l TiVCT MT has no mileage the company says 16km/l but im getting an average of 9-10 km/l which is very poor.&nbsp;</p> <p><strong>Ride Quality &amp; Handling</strong>&nbsp;Ride quality is good, the turning radius is a bit too big and hinders especially on the indian roads.</p> <p><strong>Final Words</strong>&nbsp;Good car to buy if you are willing to spend a fortune on the petrol bills or i would prefer to spend more money and go for the duster or the upcoming honda br-v.</p> <p><strong>Areas of improvement</strong>&nbsp;MILEAGE, MILEAGE AND MILEAGE.</p>good carpoor mileage

            You may also like
            Starting at Rs. 45,000
            Starting at Rs. 1,80,000

            More Expert Reviews on City and EcoSport [2015-2017]

            City comparison with similar cars

            EcoSport [2015-2017] comparison with similar cars

            City vs EcoSport [2015-2017] Comparison FAQs

            Q: Which car is cheaper between Honda City and Ford EcoSport [2015-2017]?
            Honda City price is Rs. 11.86 Lakh and Ford EcoSport [2015-2017] price is Rs. 6.98 Lakh. Hence Ford EcoSport [2015-2017] is the cheapest amongst these cars.

            Q: Which car between City and EcoSport [2015-2017] is better in terms of fuel economy?
            For the SV Petrol MT variant, mileage of City is 17.8kmpl and for the Ambiente 1.5L Ti-VCT [2015-2016] variant, mileage of EcoSport [2015-2017] is 15.8kmpl. Thus making City the most fuel efficient as compared to EcoSport [2015-2017]

            Q: How is the performance of City compared to EcoSport [2015-2017]?
            For the SV Petrol MT variant, 1498 cc Petrol engine of City produces 119 bhp @ 6600 rpm of power and 145 Nm @ 4300 rpm of torque. For the Ambiente 1.5L Ti-VCT [2015-2016] variant, 1499 cc Petrol engine of EcoSport [2015-2017] produces 110 bhp @ 6300 rpm of power and 140 Nm @ 4400 rpm of torque.
            Disclaimer: For the above Comparison of Compare City and EcoSport [2015-2017], CarWale has taken utmost care in gathering precise and accurate information about price, specs, features, colours etc, however, CarWale cannot be held liable for any direct or indirect damage/loss. For Compare City and EcoSport [2015-2017] comparison, we have considered most popular variant on CarWale as default, however, any variant of these cars can be compared.